The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
keenest interest, but seldom actively interferes. In the pauses between
the action it moralizes on the significance of the incidents which have
just occurred. Such is its position during the middle of the century. It
has been removed from the stress and turmoil of the action into a calmer
and more remote region, though it still preserves its interest in the
events upon the stage. But in the later plays of Euripides a further
development is noticeable. The chorus begins to lose even its interest
in the action. In the pauses between the dialogue it sings odes of a
mythological character, which have only the remotest connexion with the
incidents of the plot. In the course of the dialogue itself it converses
less frequently with the actors than it had done hitherto. There is
also a tendency to transfer much of the music from the orchestra to the
stage. The old duets between actors and chorus are reduced both in size
and number, and their place is taken by solos and duets sung exclusively
upon the stage. This tendency to exclude the chorus from the play was
carried still further by Agathon, who gave up all pretence of connexion
between the plot and the songs of the chorus, and converted his odes
into professed interludes. In the time of Aristotle this practice had
become universal. The choral odes were now regarded in much the same
light as the pieces of music performed between the acts in a modern
theatre.[850] Whether the chorus still took any part in the dialogue is
not stated. But we can hardly doubt that the tendency already strongly
marked in Euripides had been developed to its natural results, and that
the tragic chorus of the later fourth century was practically excluded
from all share in the conduct of the play. After the fourth century very
little is known about its history. But the evidence seems to show that
it was sometimes discarded even as early as the third century; and in
later times this came to be more and more the ordinary custom. Even when
retained, its functions were merely those of the modern band.[851]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account