The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
A suggestion has been made that the divisions into ranks and files were
utilized for musical purposes; that in tragedy, for instance, successive
passages were delivered in turns by ranks of three men, or files of five
men; and that the ranks and files of the comic chorus were used in the
same manner. This is pure conjecture. It may or may not have been the
case; but there is no evidence one way or the other. As to the musical
duets it is impossible to speak with certainty. Whether they were mostly
given by the whole chorus, or by halves, or smaller subdivisions, or
by individual choreutae, or by the coryphaeus, is a matter concerning
which there is no trustworthy information.[931] Such indications as are
supplied by varieties in metre, grammar, or subject, are too vague and
uncertain to lead to any definite conclusion. Unless, therefore, further
evidence of a distinct character is discovered, this particular question
will have to be regarded as an unsettled problem.
§ 6. _The Dancing._
In the ancient Greek drama, as in modern opera, the three sister arts
of Music, Poetry, and Dancing were all brought into requisition.
But there was this difference—in the Greek drama the poetry was the
principal feature of the performance; the music and the dancing were
subordinate. Moreover, dancing was seldom introduced by itself as a
mere spectacle; it was mainly used in combination with singing, to
interpret and add vividness to the words of the song. The music, the
poetry, and the dancing were blended together into one harmonious whole,
each part gaining an advantage by its combination with the other two.
Most, if not all, of the choral songs were accompanied by dances of one
sort or another. To the Greek mind there was an inseparable connexion
between song and dance, and the notion of choral singing unaccompanied
by dancing would have appeared strange and unusual. The two arts had
grown and developed simultaneously, as appears from the fact that many
of the technical terms in metrical phraseology referred originally to
the movements of the dance. For instance, the smallest division of a
verse was called a ‘foot’. A verse of two feet was styled a ‘basis’, or
‘stepping’. The words ‘arsis’ and ‘thesis’, which denoted the varying
stress of the voice in singing, originally referred to the raising
up and placing down of the foot in marching and dancing. These terms
show how closely the two arts of dancing and singing were associated
together in ancient Greece. A choreutes who was unable to accompany a
song with expressive dance-movements was looked down upon as an inferior
performer.[932] Dancing therefore, as might have been expected, played
a most important part in tragedy, comedy, and the satyric drama. It was
held among the Greeks in the greatest estimation, and there was none of
that feeling of degradation about it which was common among the Romans.
A man might dance in public without any loss of dignity, provided the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account