The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
When the contest was ended, and the decision of the judges had been
announced, the names of the victorious poet and of his choregus were
publicly proclaimed by the herald, and they were crowned with garlands
of ivy in the presence of the spectators. The crowning probably took
place upon the stage, and was performed by the archon.[154] There is no
mention of any special prize for the choregus, in addition to the honour
of the crown and the public proclamation of his victory. It is often
stated that the successful choregus received a tripod from the State,
which he was expected to erect upon a monument in some public place,
with an inscription recording his victory. But this was only the case in
the dithyrambic contests. In these contests each choregus appeared as
the representative of one of the ten tribes of Attica; the tripod which
he received belonged really to the tribe, and was intended to serve as
a tribal monument.[155] The dramatic choregi had no such representative
character, nor were they provided with any memorial of victory by the
State.
As to the rewards for the poets, the tradition was that in the earliest
times the prize for tragedy was a goat, the prize for comedy a basket
of figs and a jar of wine.[156] After the dramatic contests had been
regularly organized, each of the competing poets received a payment of
money from the State, differing no doubt in amount, according to the
place he gained in the competition.[157] Nothing is known as to the value
of these prizes. But as the ancient dramatist had not only to write
his plays, but also to superintend their production, the demands upon
his time and energy must have been very great, and the rewards would
be correspondingly large. Some idea of the scale on which the amounts
were graduated, according to the place of each poet in the competition,
may be gathered from the analogy of the dithyrambic contests instituted
by Lycurgus in the Peiraeeus. In these contests not less than three
choruses were to take part, and the prizes were to be ten minae for
the first chorus, eight for the second, and six for the third.[158]
The payment of the dramatic poets was probably arranged in a somewhat
similar proportion. Towards the end of the fifth century the prizes
were reduced in amount by certain commissioners of the Treasury, named
Archinus and Agyrrhius. Accordingly in the Frogs of Aristophanes these
two statesmen are placed in the list of bad men who are not allowed to
join the chorus of the initiated.[159] The fact that all of the competing
poets received a reward of money need cause no astonishment. They were
the poets chosen, after selection, to provide the entertainment at the
annual festivals. They were not selected until their plays had been
carefully examined by the archon and found to be of the requisite merit.
To be allowed to exhibit at all was a considerable distinction. There
was nothing dishonourable for an ordinary poet in being placed last in
the competition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account