The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
It is difficult in modern times to realize fully the keenness of the
interest with which the various dramatic contests were regarded by the
old Athenians, and the value which was attached to victories obtained
in them. The greatest statesman was proud to be successful with a
chorus in tragedy or comedy. It was a proof both of his taste and of
his munificence. The tragic poet held as high a place in the popular
estimation as the orator or the general. Victorious competitors were not
content with the mere temporary glory they obtained. Every care was taken
to perpetuate the memory of their success in a permanent form. Elaborate
records were also erected by the state. A description of the various
kinds of memorials, of which fragments have been preserved, will be a
convincing proof of the enthusiasm with which the drama was regarded in
ancient times.
First, as to the private monuments. These were erected by the victorious
choregi, and appear to have differed widely in style and costliness,
according to the wealth and taste of the individuals. Thus the mean
man in Theophrastus, when he had been successful with a tragic chorus,
was content to erect a mere wooden scroll in commemoration of his
victory.[177] Another cheap device was to dedicate some article of
theatrical costume, such as an actor’s mask.[178] But the ordinary form
of memorial, in the case of the dramatic contests, consisted of a marble
tablet, containing a painting or sculptured relief.[179] At first, no
doubt, these tablets were of small size and simple workmanship; but in
course of time, with the growth of luxurious habits, they began to assume
a more elaborate form. For instance, the monument set up by Xenocles
in 306 was about fourteen feet high, the tablet being enclosed in a
magnificent architectural structure, with columns and entablature.[180]
The paintings and reliefs upon the tablets were no less variable. Some
of them depicted masks, or crowns of victory, or similar emblems; others
contained representations of Dionysus or Silenus. Sometimes groups of
figures were portrayed, such as a chorus of singers with the choregus in
the centre. Sometimes a scene was inserted from the tragedy or comedy in
which the victory had been obtained.[181] But though the tablets differed
in magnificence, the inscriptions upon them were generally simple and
concise, and consisted merely of the names of the poet and choregus,
and of the archon for the year, with the addition in later times of the
name of the actor. The record inscribed by Themistocles in honour of his
tragic victory in 476 ran as follows:[182]—
Choregus, Themistocles of Phrearria:
Poet, Phrynichus:
Archon, Adeimantus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account