The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
Poets and choregi having been associated together in pairs, there still
remained the selection and appointment of the actors. The manner in which
they were appointed differed very considerably at different periods. To
take the case of tragic actors first. Before the time of Aeschylus, when
tragedy was more a lyrical than a dramatic performance, consisting of
long choral odes interspersed with recitatives, actors did not exist as
a separate class. Only one actor was required in each play, and his part
was taken by the poet.[225] But when Aeschylus increased the number of
actors to two, and converted tragedy from a lyrical into a dramatic form
of art, the poets ceased to perform in their own plays, and the actor’s
profession came into existence. For the next fifty years or so it does
not appear that the state took any part in the selection of the actors.
It left the matter in the hands of the poets. Particular actors are found
to have been permanently connected with particular poets. Aeschylus is
said to have first employed Cleander as his actor, and to have afterwards
associated a second actor with him in the person of Mynniscus.[226]
Tlepolemus acted continuously for Sophocles.[227] It is stated, on the
authority of Ister, that Sophocles was accustomed to write his plays
with a view to the capacities of his actors.[228] This story, whether
true or not, shows that he chose his actors himself, at any rate during
the earlier part of his career. But as the actors grew in importance,
their selection was no longer left to the choice of individual poets, but
was undertaken by the state. Henceforth we cease to hear of particular
poets and actors being permanently associated together. The statement of
Thomas Magister, that Cephisophon was the actor of Euripides, appears to
be a mere conjecture, as Cephisophon is nowhere else described in that
way.[229] The change in the method of selection was probably introduced
about the middle of the fifth century, when the contests in acting
were established, and the position of the actors received its first
official recognition. Under the new arrangement, three protagonists
were first of all selected by the archon. There is no information as
to the way in which they were selected. They may have been chosen by
means of a small competition, similar to that between comic actors at
the Chytri. The subordinate actors were apparently not chosen by the
state, but each protagonist was allowed to provide his own deuteragonist
and tritagonist.[230] When the three leading actors had been chosen
they were assigned to the three competing tragic poets by lot. Probably
the system was the same as in the assignation of the flute-players to
the dithyrambic choruses. The poets would first draw lots for order of
choice, and then each poet would choose his actor. The actor performed
all the tragedies of the poet to whom he was allotted. Thus in 418 the
three tragedies of Callistratus were acted by Callippides; the three
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account