The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
then proceeded to keep the original manuscript for himself, and sent back
merely the transcript to Athens. The Athenians had to console themselves
with the fifteen talents which were forfeited. This old copy of the
tragic writers was most probably that made in accordance with the law of
Lycurgus.[298]
Athenian comedy, as was previously pointed out, continued to grow and
develop long after tragedy had been reduced to a state of stagnation. The
need for the reproduction of old comedies was therefore not felt until a
much later epoch. The first recorded instances of revivals of this kind
belong to the second century B.C. The system which was then introduced
appears to have been identical with that adopted in the case of tragedy.
A single old comedy was exhibited at each festival as a prelude to the
new ones. As far as our information goes the specimen selected was taken
in every case from the works of Menander and his contemporaries.[299]
To turn once more to tragedy. The fourth century was an age of great
actors, just as the fifth century had been an age of great poets. The
principal actors of the fourth century filled a more important place in
the history of tragedy than the dramatic poets themselves. Their fame
was chiefly derived from their impersonations of characters out of the
great tragedies of the past. A novel interpretation of a celebrated
rôle, such as that of Antigone or Medea, was a much greater event in
dramatic circles, and excited far more discussion, than the production
of a new play. In exactly the same way the great English actors of the
last hundred years or so are remembered, not so much for the new dramas
which they brought out, as for their impersonation of parts like Hamlet
and Othello. From the numerous references to Athenian actors of the
fourth century, and to the old tragedies which they exhibited, it is
possible to glean some interesting facts in regard to these revivals.
We are able to trace the course of the popular taste, and to discover
who were the favourite poets, and which were the plays in most demand.
The three great masters of tragedy, Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides,
occupied a position by themselves in popular estimation, and quite
overshadowed all other poets. This is proved by the law of Lycurgus. But
though the existence of the law shows that the tragedies of Aeschylus
were occasionally reproduced, and were therefore liable to corruption,
it does not appear that in this later age Aeschylus was very popular
upon the stage. The only allusion to a particular revival of his plays
is that which occurs in one of the letters of Alciphron, where the
tragic actor Licymnius is said to have been victorious in the Propompi
of Aeschylus.[300] On the other hand, the reproductions of plays of
Sophocles and Euripides are very frequently referred to. And it is a
significant fact that when the actor Satyrus was consoling Demosthenes
for the ill-success of his first speech before the assembly, and wished
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account