The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
From this reproduction of old plays of Aeschylus must be carefully
distinguished those instances where plays, which Aeschylus had left
unpublished at his death, were produced for the first time by his son
Euphorion. It is said that Euphorion won four victories with his father’s
unpublished tragedies. In a similar manner the Oedipus Coloneus of
Sophocles was produced for the first time by his grandson four years
after the poet’s death. And after the death of Euripides, his Iphigeneia
in Aulis, Alcmaeon, and Bacchae were brought out by his son at the
City Dionysia.[294] On such occasions as these, although no doubt the
real authorship of the plays was perfectly well known at the time, the
relative appeared as the nominal author. He asked for a chorus from
the archon in his own name. The plays he produced were new ones. There
is therefore no similarity between instances of this kind and those
occasions when a man asked for a chorus, not in his own name, but in
order to produce old plays of Aeschylus.
It was not till the fourth century that the reproduction of old plays
developed into a regular custom. The practice was at first confined
to tragedy. This branch of the drama had passed beyond the period of
healthy growth, and already showed symptoms of decay. The three great
tragic poets of the fifth century had in their several lines exhausted
the capabilities of Attic tragedy. Their successors were mostly feeble
imitators of Euripides. Under such circumstances the tendency to fall
back upon the early drama naturally became more prevalent. In the records
of the City Dionysia during the latter half of the fourth century it
is found that the series of new tragedies was invariably preceded by
the performance of an old one.[295] The same practice was also no doubt
adopted at the Lenaea. The actors who had the privilege of conducting
these revivals would be selected by the archon, probably after a
small preliminary competition of the kind described in the previous
chapter.[296] It appears that these actors, in preparing the old plays
for reproduction, were sometimes inclined to tamper with the text, and
to introduce what they considered improvements, just as the plays of
Shakespeare were adapted for the stage by Garrick in the last century. A
law was passed by the orator Lycurgus to put a stop to this practice. It
was enacted that a public copy should be made of the works of Aeschylus,
Sophocles, and Euripides, and deposited in the state archives; and that
the actors, in their performances, should not be allowed to deviate from
the text of the copy.[297] It is very probable that this authorized
version eventually found its way to Alexandria. Ptolemy the Third was a
great collector of manuscripts. He borrowed from the Athenians an old
copy of the works of Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides, promising to
return it after he had made a transcript, and depositing fifteen talents
as security. The transcript was made in the best possible style. Ptolemy
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account