‘Yours ever,
‘CHARLES BURNEY.’
From Miss Burney, afterwards Mdme. d’Arblay, writing on some traits
of my character, &c.:—
‘Chelsea College: July 17, 1792.
‘Nay, if you talk of your difficulties in fabricating an epistle
to me, please to consider how much greater are mine in attempting
to answer it. You! a country farmer, the acknowledged head of “the
_only art worth cultivating_,” as you tell us,—the contemner of
every other pursuit, the scorner of all old customs, the defier of
all musty authorities, the derider of all fogrum superiors,—in one
word a Jacobin. You afraid? and of whom? a Chelsea pensioner? One
who, maimed in the royal service, ignobly forbears, spurning royal
reparation? One who, though flying a court, degenerately refrains
from hating or even reviling kings, queens, and princesses? One
who presumes to wish as well to manufactures for her outside, as
to agriculture for her inside? One who has the ignorance to
reverence commerce, and who cannot think of a single objection to
the Wool Bill? One, in short, and to say all that is abominable at
once, one who in theory is an aristocrat, and in practice a
_ci-devant_ courtier?
‘And shall a creature of this description, the willing advocate of
every opinion, every feeling you excommunicate from “your business
and bosom,” _dare_ to write to _you_? Impossible!
‘Whether I shall come and see you all or not is another matter. If
I can I will.
‘P.S. Will Honeycomb says if you would know anything of a lady’s
meaning (always providing she has any) when she writes to you,
look at her postscript. Now pray, dear sir, how came you ever to
imagine what you are pleased to blazon to the world with all the
confidence of self-belief, that you think farming the only thing
worth manly attention? You, who, if taste rather than circumstance
had been your guide, might have found wreaths and flowers almost
any way you had turned, as fragrant as those of Ceres.’
My reply:—
‘You, “the willing advocate of every feeling I excommunicate from
my bosom,” knew you had thrown so bitter a potion into your letter
that you could not (kind creature!) help a little sweetening in
the postscript; but must there in your sweets be some alloy? Could
you not conclude without falling foul of poor Ceres?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account