_November 23._—The 17th, 18th, and 19th at Euston, and I had much
conversation with the duke, in which I earnestly endeavoured to
impress on his mind the fact, that by his tenets he placed himself
entirely under the covenant of works, and that he must be tried for
them, and that I would not be in such a situation for ten thousand
worlds. He was mild and more patient than I expected.
He lent me, and I read it there, Priestley’s Life, by himself. He
asked me what I thought of it? My reply was that through the whole
it was the recital of a man perfectly well satisfied with himself,
not the confessions of a sinner lamenting what has been wrong in
him. He seems to have had no feeling of the sort; as if, when tried
by the test of his own merit, it would be a great injustice in God
not to be satisfied with him, and that I had no conception of any
man having it in his power to review or detail his life with any
religious aspect without much self-condemnation, and beseeching God
to try him in any way rather than by an appeal to his life or his
own merit, but (if he be really a Christian) by the merits only of
the blood of his Redeemer. He said it was my view of things, and not
that of the doctor, whom he believed was undoubtedly a very good
man. The conversation continued, but we were as far as the poles
asunder. The duke has drawn up memoirs of his life, and he and Lady
Augusta read to me that part which concerned his own administration,
which is very satisfactory, as it consists much of original letters.
He appears to much more advantage in it than I conceived he would
have done, and it was certainly a wise step to leave such a memorial
in justification of himself. Lord Templeton there one day. They seem
to me to grow more and more economical, and to descend to minute
attentions which are below their rank and fortune.
I do not feel comfortable, though he always receives me well, and
desires me to come again. It is long since I was there before, and
will be long before I go again; such visits, however, have very
little of dissipation in them, and so much the better.
The less we like them the safer they are.
[Note, probably by Mary, Arthur Young’s only surviving daughter]:
‘1807. It was upon this journey [into Oxfordshire] that Mr. Y. first
perceived the approach of that dimness of sight which afterwards
terminated in its total eclipse. His first suspicion arose from
looking at the planet Jupiter, and perceiving what appeared to him
to be two very small stars near him, at which he was much surprised,
as he knew that the satellites were invisible to the naked eye, and
nobody saw these stars but himself. This multiplication of bright
objects increased the following year, till at last one lamp appeared
to him to be five. Objects became by degrees more and more confused,
and at last totally disappeared.’
(Total blindness appears to have resulted from the failure of an
operation for cataract, as will be seen later on.)
-----
Footnote 223:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account