The Autobiography of Mark Rutherford, Edited by his friend Reuben ShapcottWhite, William Hale
General
The Autobiography of Mark Rutherford, Edited by his friend Reuben Shapcott
White, William Hale
Religious fiction
“I do not agree with you,” said Theresa. “I disagree with you utterly.
I dislike foolish, inane sentiment—it makes me sick; but I do believe, in
the first place, that no man was ever good for anything who has not been
devoured, I was going to say, by a great devotion to a woman. The lives
of your great men are as much the history of women whom they adored as of
themselves. Dante, Byron, Shelley, it is the same with all of them, and
there is no mistake about it; it is the great fact of life. What would
Shakespeare be without it? and Shakespeare is life. A man, worthy to be
named a man, will find the fact of love perpetually confronting him till
he reaches old age, and if he be not ruined by worldliness or
dissipation, will be troubled by it when he is fifty as much as when he
was twenty-five. It is the subject of all subjects. People abuse love,
and think it the cause of half the mischief in the world. It is the one
thing that keeps the world straight, and if it were not for that
overpowering instinct, human nature would fall asunder; would be the prey
of inconceivable selfishness and vices, and finally, there would be
universal suicide. I did not intend to be eloquent: I hate being
eloquent. But you did not mean what you said; you spoke from the head or
teeth merely.”
Theresa’s little speech was delivered not with any heat of the blood.
There was no excitement in her grey eyes, nor did her cheek burn. Her
brain seemed to rule everything. This was an idea she had, and she
kindled over it because it was an idea. It was impossible, of course,
that she should say what she did without some movement of the organ in
her breast, but how much share this organ had in her utterances I never
could make out. How much was due to the interest which she as a
looker-on felt in men and women, and how much was due to herself as a
woman, was always a mystery to me.
She was fond of music, and occasionally I asked her to play to me. She
had a great contempt for bungling, and not being a professional player,
she never would try a piece in my presence of which she was not perfectly
master. She particularly liked to play Mozart, and on my asking her once
to play a piece of Beethoven, she turned round upon me and said: “You
like Beethoven best. I knew you would. He encourages a luxurious
revelling in the incomprehensible and indefinably sublime. He is not
good for you.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account