Baculum: Stalk broad, greatest length (3.7 to 4.3 mm.) 1-1/2 times
greatest breadth, relatively flattened, greatest depth 1/3 greatest
breadth; single median ossified process, in smaller of two specimens this
ossification incomplete and of unusual shape (Fig. 39); length of stalk 4
times length of median process; concavities of basal tuberosities
medially confluent, constriction less than 1/2 greatest depth; widest
point of shaft less than 1/4 length of shaft from posteriormost point;
shaft wider than high except at distal end that is inflated dorsally and
sometimes laterally; both ventral and dorsal concavities of base of stalk
broad and moderately deep; posterior profile in dorsal view evenly
rounded or having marginal notch.
In the absence of ossified lateral processes my two specimens differ from
bacula of _Microtus (Arvicola) terrestris_ figured by Didier (1943:79,
1954:245, 247, 248) and by Ognev (1950:591). The median process relative
to the size of the shaft is smaller, and the shaft relative to its length
is wider in _M. richardsoni_ than in _M. terrestris_. The stalk of _M.
(Arvicola) amphibius_ figured by Didier is like that of _M. richardsoni_
in its greater breadth and median notch on posterior border.
The relationship of the New World water rat, _M. richardsoni_, to the Old
World water rats (genus _Arvicola_ of some European authors) is
uncertain. Miller (1896:66) placed all of them in the subgenus
_Arvicola_. Subsequent authors, stressing differences in the teeth, have
placed _M. richardsoni_ in the subgenus _Aulacomys_ of Rhoads. Zimmerman
(1955) has shown that teeth in some _Arvicola_ approach the more complex
pattern of _M. richardsoni_. He argues also that _Arvicola_ is
generically distinct from _Microtus_ on the grounds that the two groups
have separate origins, _Arvicola_ having descended from the genus
_Mimomys_ and _Microtus_ from some other group of microtines. This
argument also was advanced by Hinton (1926:47-48). Pending further
studies of the possible polyphyletic origin of other subgenera of the
genus _Microtus_, I refer both _M. richardsoni_ and _M. terrestris_ to
the subgenus _Arvicola_.
The evidence afforded by the bacula available is not conclusive as to
relations of Old World and New World water rats. No general agreement on
the number of species in this Palaearctic group has been reached, and
bacula of only three or four of the numerous Old World subspecies have
been figured. I have examined none.
_Specimens examined_: Two, from Wyoming; 42454 (31 mi. N Pinedale, 8025
ft., Sublette Co.), 37903 (23-1/2 mi. S, 5 mi. W Lander, 8600 ft.,
Fremont Co.).
Microtus (Chilotus) oregoni (Bachman)
Fig. 45
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account