The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
The cumulative effect of all these exciting and trying experiences was
the growth of a distinctly more sympathetic feeling towards Serbia in
Europe at large, and especially a rallying of all the elements
throughout the Serb and Croat provinces of Austria-Hungary, except the
extreme clericals of Agram, to the Serbian cause; briefly, the effect
was the exact opposite of that desired by Vienna and Budapest.
Meanwhile events had been happening elsewhere which revived the
drooping interest and flagging hopes of Serbia in the development of
foreign affairs. The attainment of power by the Young Turks and the
introduction of parliamentary government had brought no improvement to
the internal condition of the Ottoman Empire, and the Balkan peoples
made no effort to conceal their satisfaction at the failure of the
revolution to bring about reform by magic. The counter-revolution of
April 1909 and the accession of the Sultan Mohammed V made things no
better. In Macedonia, and especially in Albania, they had been going
from bad to worse. The introduction of universal military service and
obligatory payment of taxes caused a revolution in Albania, where such
innovations were not at all appreciated. From 1909 till 1911 there was
a state of perpetual warfare in Albania, with which the Young Turks, in
spite of cruel reprisals, were unable to cope, until, in the summer of
that year, Austria threatened to intervene unless order were restored;
some sort of settlement was patched up, and an amnesty was granted to
the rebels by the new Sultan. This unfortunate man, after being
rendered almost half-witted by having been for the greater part of his
life kept a prisoner by his brother the tyrant Abdul Hamid, was now the
captive of the Young Turks, and had been compelled by them to make as
triumphal a progress as fears for his personal safety would allow
through the provinces of European Turkey. But it was obvious to Balkan
statesmen that Turkey was only changed in name, and that, if its
threatened regeneration had slightly postponed their plans for its
partition amongst themselves, the ultimate consummation of these plans
must be pursued with, if possible, even greater energy and expedition
than before. It was also seen by the more perspicacious of them that
the methods hitherto adopted must in future be radically altered. A
rejuvenated though unreformed Turkey, bent on self-preservation, could
not be despised, and it was understood that if the revolutionary bands
of the three Christian nations (Greece, Serbia, and Bulgaria) were to
continue indefinitely to cut each others’ throats in Macedonia the
tables might conceivably be turned on them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account