The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
Substantial relief from their burdens—the primary though negative
condition of national revival—accrued to the Greek peasantry from the
decay of Ottoman militarism in all its branches. The Turkish feudal
aristocracy, which had replaced the landed nobility of the Romaic
Empire in Anatolia and established itself on the choicest lands in
conquered Europe, was beginning to decline in strength. We have seen
that it failed to implant itself in Krete, and its numbers were already
stationary elsewhere. The Greek peasant slowly began to regain ground
upon his Moslem lord, and he profited further by the degeneration of
the janissary corps at the heart of the empire.
The janissaries had started as a militant, almost monastic body,
condemned to celibacy, and recruited exclusively from the Christian
tribute-children. But in 1566 they extorted the privilege of legal
marriage for themselves, and of admittance into the corps for the sons
of their wedlock. The next century completed their transformation from
a standing army into a hereditary urban militia—an armed and privileged
_bourgeoisie_, rapidly increasing in numbers and correspondingly
jealous of extraneous candidates for the coveted vacancies in their
ranks. They gradually succeeded in abolishing the enrolment of
Christian recruits altogether, and the last regular levy of children
for that purpose was made in 1676. Vested interests at Constantinople
had freed the helpless peasant from the most crushing burden of all.
At the same moment the contemporary tendency in western Europe towards
bureaucratic centralization began to extend itself to the Ottoman
Empire. Its exponents were the brothers Achmet and Mustapha Köprili,
who held the grand-vizierate in succession. They laid the foundations
of a centralized administration, and, since the unadaptable Turk
offered no promising material for their policy, they sought their
instruments in the subject race. The continental Greeks were too
effectively crushed to aspire beyond the preservation of their own
existence; but the islands had been less sorely tried, and Khios, which
had enjoyed over two centuries[1] of prosperity under the rule of a
Genoese chartered company, and exchanged it for Ottoman sovereignty
under peculiarly lenient conditions, could still supply Achmet a
century later with officials of the intelligence and education he
required, Khiots were the first to fill the new offices of ‘Dragoman of
the Porte’ (secretary of state) and ‘Dragoman of the Fleet’ (civil
complement of the Turkish capitan-pasha); and they took care in their
turn to staff the subordinate posts of their administration with a host
of pushing friends and dependants. The Dragoman of the Fleet wielded
the fiscal, and thereby in effect the political, authority over the
Greek islands in the Aegean; but this was not the highest power to
which the new Greek bureaucracy attained. Towards the beginning of the
eighteenth century Moldavia and Wallachia—the two ‘Danubian Provinces’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account