The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
now united in the kingdom of Rumania—were placed in charge of Greek
officials with the rank of voivode or prince, and with practically
sovereign power within their delegated dominions. A Danubian
principality became the reward of a successful dragoman’s career, and
these high posts were rapidly monopolized by a close ring of official
families, who exercised their immense patronage in favour of their
race, and congregated round the Greek patriarch in the ‘Phanari’,[2]
the Constantinopolitan slum assigned him for his residence by Mohammed
the Conqueror.
[Footnote 1: 1346-1566.]
[Footnote 2: ‘Lighthouse-quarter.’]
The alliance of this parvenu ‘Phanariot’ aristocracy with the
conservative Orthodox Church was not unnatural, for the Church itself
had greatly extended its political power under Ottoman suzerainty. The
Ottoman Government hardly regarded its Christian subjects as integral
members of the state, and was content to leave their civil government
in the hands of their spiritual pastors to an extent the Romaic
emperors would never have tolerated. It allowed the Patriarchate at
Constantinople to become its official intermediary with the Greek race,
and it further extended the Greek patriarch’s authority over the other
conquered populations of Orthodox faith—Bulgars, Rumans, and
Serbs—which had never been incorporated in the ecclesiastical or
political organization of the Romaic Empire, but which learnt under
Ottoman rule to receive their priests and bishops from the Greek
ecclesiastics of the capital, and even to call themselves by the Romaic
name. In 1691 Mustapha Köprili recognized and confirmed the rights of
all Christian subjects of the Sultan by a general organic law.
Mustapha’s ‘New Ordinance’ was dictated by the reverses which
Christians beyond the frontier were inflicting upon the Ottoman arms,
for pressure from without had followed hard upon disintegration within.
Achmet’s pyrrhic triumph over Candia in 1669 was followed in 1683 by
his brother Mustapha’s disastrous discomfiture before the walls of
Vienna, and these two sieges marked the turn of the Ottoman tide. The
ebb was slow, yet the ascendancy henceforth lay with Turkey’s Christian
neighbours, and they began to cut short her frontiers on every side.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account