The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
Adrian II proved no more sympathetic, and in 870, during the reign of
the Emperor Basil I, it was decided without more ado that the Bulgarian
Church should be directly under the Bishop of Constantinople, on the
ground that the kingdom of Boris was a vassal-state of the basileus,
and that from the Byzantine point of view, as opposed to that of Rome,
the State came first and the Church next. The Moravian Gorazd, a
disciple of Methodius, was appointed Metropolitan, and at his death he
was succeeded by his fellow countryman and co-disciple Clement, who by
means of the construction of numerous churches and monasteries did a
great deal for the propagation of light and learning in Bulgaria. The
definite subjection of the Bulgarian Church to that of Byzantium was an
important and far-reaching event. Boris has been reproached with
submitting himself and his country to Greek influence, but in those
days it was either Constantinople or Rome (there was no third way); and
in view of the proximity of Constantinople and the glamour which its
civilization cast all over the Balkans, it is not surprising that the
Greeks carried the day.
6
_The Rise and Fall of the First Bulgarian Empire_, 893–972
During the reign of Simeon, second son of Boris, which lasted from 893
to 927, Bulgaria reached a very high level of power and prosperity.
Simeon, called the Great, is looked on by Bulgarians as their most
capable monarch and his reign as the most brilliant period of their
history. He had spent his childhood at Constantinople and been educated
there, and he became such an admirer of Greek civilization that he was
nicknamed _Hèmiargos_. His instructors had done their work so well that
Simeon remained spellbound by the glamour of Constantinople throughout
his life, and, although he might have laid the foundations of a solid
empire in the Balkans, his one ambition was to conquer Byzantium and to
be recognized as basileus—an ambition which was not to be fulfilled.
His first campaign against the Greeks was not very fruitful, because
the latter summoned the Magyars, already settled in Hungary, to their
aid and they attacked Simeon from the north. Simeon in return called
the Pechenegs, another fierce Tartar tribe, to his aid, but this merely
resulted in their definite establishment in Rumania. During the twenty
years of peace, which strange to say filled the middle of his reign
(894-913), the internal development of Bulgaria made great strides. The
administration was properly organized, commerce was encouraged, and
agriculture flourished. In the wars against the Greeks which occupied
his last years he was more successful, and inflicted a severe defeat on
them at Anchialo (the modern Ahiolu) in 917; but he was still unable to
get from them what he wanted, and at last, in 921, he was obliged to
proclaim himself _basileus_ and _autocratōr_ of all Bulgars and Greeks,
a title which nobody else recognized. He reappeared before
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account