The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
There was one last hope left to Rumania: that the Congress which met in
Berlin in June 1878 for the purpose of revising the Treaty of San
Stefano, would prevent such an injustice. But Bismarck was anxious that
no ‘sentiment de dignité blessée’ should rankle in Russia’s future
policy; the French representative, Waddington, was ‘above all a
practical man’; Corti, the Italian delegate, was ‘nearly rude’ to the
Rumanian delegates; while Lord Beaconsfield, England’s envoy, receiving
the Rumanian delegates privately, had nothing to say but that ‘in
politics the best services are often rewarded with ingratitude’. Russia
strongly opposed even the idea that the Rumanian delegates should be
allowed to put their case before the Congress, and consent was obtained
only with difficulty after Lord Salisbury had ironically remarked that
‘having heard the representatives of Greece, which was claiming foreign
provinces, it would be but fair to listen also to the representatives
of a country which was only seeking to retain what was its own’.
Shortly before, Lord Salisbury, speaking in London to the Rumanian
special envoy, Callimaki Catargiu, had assured him of England’s
sympathy and of her effective assistance in case either of war or of a
Congress. ‘But to be quite candid he must add that there are questions
of more concern to England, and should she be able to come to an
understanding with Russia with regard to them, she would not wage war
for the sake of Rumania.’ Indeed, an understanding came about, and an
indiscretion enabled the _Globe_ to make its tenor public early in June
1878. ‘The Government of her Britannic Majesty’, it said, ‘considers
that it will feel itself bound to express its deep regret should Russia
persist in demanding the retrocession of Bessarabia…. England’s
interest in this question is not such, however, as to justify her
taking upon herself alone the responsibility of opposing the intended
exchange.’ So Bessarabia was lost, Rumania receiving instead Dobrudja
with the delta of the Danube. But as the newly created state of
Bulgaria was at the time little else than a detached Russian province,
Russia, alone amongst the powers, opposed and succeeded in preventing
the demarcation to the new Rumanian province of a strategically sound
frontier. Finally, to the exasperation of the Rumanians, the Congress
made the recognition of Rumania’s independence contingent upon the
abolition of Article 7 of the Constitution—which denied to
non-Christians the right of becoming Rumanian citizens—and the
emancipation of the Rumanian Jews.[1]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account