The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
[Footnote 1: Rumania only partially gave way to this intrusion of the
powers into her internal affairs. The prohibition was abolished; but
only individual naturalization was made possible, and that by special
Act of Parliament. Only a very small proportion of the Jewish
population has since been naturalized. The Jewish question in Rumania
is undoubtedly a very serious one; but the matter is too controversial
to be dealt with in a few lines without risking misrepresentation or
doing an injustice to one or other of the parties. For which reason it
has not been included in this essay.]
It was only after innumerable difficulties and hardships that, at the
beginning of 1880, Rumania secured recognition of an independence which
she owed to nobody but herself. Whilst Russia was opposing Rumania at
every opportunity in the European conferences and commissions, she was
at pains to show herself more amenable in _tête-à-tête_, and approached
Rumania with favourable proposals. ‘Rather Russia as foe than
guardian,’ wrote Prince Carol to his father; and these words indicate
an important turning-point in Rumania’s foreign policy.
In wresting Bessarabia from Rumania merely as a sop to her own pride,
and to make an end of all that was enacted by the Treaty of Paris,
1856, Russia made a serious political blunder. By insisting that
Austria should share in the partition of Poland, Frederick the Great
had skilfully prevented her from remaining the one country towards
which the Poles would naturally have turned for deliverance. Such an
opportunity was lost by Russia through her short-sighted policy in
Bessarabia—that of remaining the natural ally of Rumania against
Rumania’s natural foe, Austria-Hungary.
Rumania had neither historical, geographical, nor any important
ethnographical points of contact with the region south of the Danube;
the aims of a future policy could only have embraced neighbouring
tracts of foreign territory inhabited by Rumanians. Whereas up to the
date of the Berlin Congress such tracts were confined to
Austria-Hungary, by that Congress a similar sphere of attraction for
Rumanian aspirations was created in Russia.[1] The interests of a
peaceful development demanded that Rumania should maintain friendly
relations with both the powers striving for domination in the Near
East; it was a vital necessity for her, however, to be able to rely
upon the effective support of at least one of them in a case of
emergency. Russia’s conduct had aroused a deep feeling of bitterness
and mistrust in Rumania, and every lessening of her influence was a
step in Austria’s favour. Secondary considerations tended to intensify
this: on the one hand lay the fact that through Russia’s interposition
Rumania had no defendable frontier against Bulgaria; on the other hand
was the greatly strengthened position created for Austria by her
alliance with Germany, in whose future Prince Carol had the utmost
confidence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account