The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
It has been waiting, nevertheless, ever since—waiting for much more
than a century; and perhaps the end is not even yet. Why, then, have
expectations not only within but without the empire been so greatly at
fault? How came Montesquieu, Burke, and other confident prophets since
their time to be so signally mistaken? There were several co-operating
causes, but one paramount. Constantinople was no longer, as in 1453, a
matter of concern only to itself, its immediate neighbours, and certain
trading republics of Italy. It had become involved with the commercial
interests of a far wider circle, in particular of the great trading
peoples of western Europe, the British, the French, and the Dutch, and
with the political interests of the Germanic and Russian nations. None
of these could be indifferent to a revolution in its fortunes, and
least of all to its passing, not to a power out of Asia, but to a rival
power among themselves. Europe was already in labour with the doctrine
of the Balance of Power. The bantling would not be born at Vienna till
early in the century to come: but even before the end of the eighteenth
century it could be foreseen that its life would be bound up with the
maintenance of Constantinople in independence of any one of the parent
powers—that is, with the prolongation of the Osmanli phase of its
imperial fortunes. This doctrine, consistently acted upon by Europe,
has been the sheet anchor of the Ottoman empire for a century. Even to
this day its Moslem dynasty has never been without one powerful
Christian champion or another.
There were, however, some thirty years still to elapse after Selim’s
accession before that doctrine was fully born: and had her hands been
free, Russia might well have been in secure possession of the Byzantine
throne long before 1815. For, internally, the Osmanli state went from
bad to worse. The tumultuous insubordination of the Janissaries became
an ever greater scandal. Never in all the long history of their riots
was their record for the years 1807-9 equalled or even approached.
Never before, also, had the provinces been so utterly out of hand. This
was the era of Jezzar the Butcher at Acre, of the rise of Mehemet Ali
in Egypt, of Ali Pasha in Epirus, and of Pasvanoghlu at Vidin. When
Mahmud II was thrust on to the throne in 1809, he certainly began his
reign with no more personal authority and no more imperial prestige or
jurisdiction than the last Greek emperor had enjoyed on his accession
in 1448.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account