The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
The great European war, however, which had been raging intermittently
for nearly twenty years, had saved Mahmud an empire to which he could
succeed in name and try to give substance. Whatever the Osmanlis
suffered during that war, it undoubtedly kept them in Constantinople.
Temporary loss of Egypt and the small damage done by the British attack
on Constantinople in 1807 were a small price to pay for the diversion
of Russia’s main energies to other than Byzantine fields, and for the
assurance, made doubly sure when the great enemy did again attack, that
she would not be allowed to settle the account alone. Whatever Napoleon
may have planned and signed at Tilsit, the aegis of France was
consistently opposed to the enemies of the Osmanlis down to the close
of the Napoleonic age.
Thus it came about that those thirty perilous years passed without the
expected catastrophe. There was still a successor of Osman reigning in
Constantinople when the great Christian powers, met in conclave at
Vienna, half unconsciously guaranteed the continued existence of the
Osmanli Empire simply by leaving it out of account in striking a
Balance of Power in Europe. Its European territory, with the capital
within it, was of quite enough importance to disturb seriously the nice
adjustment agreed at Vienna; and, therefore, while any one’s henceforth
to take or leave, it would become always some one’s to guard. A few
years had yet to pass before the phrase, the Maintenance of the
Integrity of the Ottoman Empire, would be a watchword of European
diplomacy: but, whether formulated thus or not, that principle became a
sure rock of defence for the Osmanli Empire on the birthday of the
doctrine of the Balance of Power.
Secure from destruction by any foes but those of his own household, as
none knew better than he, the reigning Osmanli was scheming to regain
the independence and dignity of his forefathers. Himself a creature of
the Janissaries, Mahmud had plotted the abolition of his creators from
the first year of his reign, but making a too precipitate effort after
the conclusion of peace with Russia, had ignominiously failed and
fallen into worse bondage than ever. Now, better assured of his
imperial position and supported by leading men of all classes among his
subjects, he returned not only to his original enterprise but to
schemes for removing other checks on the power of the sovereign which
had come into being in the last two centuries—notably the feudal
independence of the Dere Beys, and the irresponsibility of provincial
governors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account