The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
Despite the good intentions of Abdul Aziz himself—as sincere as can be
credited to a disordered brain—-and despite more than one minister of
outstanding ability, reform and almost everything else in the empire
went to the bad in this unhappy reign. The administration settled down
to lifeless routine and lapsed into corruption: the national army was
starved: the depreciation of the currency grew worse as the revenue
declined and the sultan’s household and personal extravagance
increased. Encouraged by the inertia of the imperial Government, the
Christians of the European provinces waxed bold. Though Montenegro was
severely handled for contumacy, the Serbs were able to cover their
penultimate stage towards freedom by forcing in 1867 the withdrawal of
the last Ottoman garrisons from their fortresses. Krete stood at bay
for three years and all but won her liberty. Bosnia rose in arms, but
divided against herself. Pregnant with graver trouble than these,
Bulgaria showed signs of waking from long sleep. In 1870 she obtained
recognition as a nationality in the Ottoman Empire, her Church being
detached from the control of the Oecumenical Patriarch of the Greeks
and placed under an Exarch. Presently, her peasantry growing ever more
restive, passed from protest to revolt against the Circassian
refugee-colonists with whom the Porte was flooding the land. The
sultan, in an evil hour, for lack of trained troops, let loose
irregulars on the villages, and the Bulgarian atrocities, which they
committed in 1875, sowed a fatal harvest for his successor to reap. His
own time was almost fulfilled. The following spring a dozen high
officials, with the assent of the Sheikh-ul-Islam and the active
dissent of no one, took Abdul Aziz from his throne to a prison, wherein
two days later he perished, probably by his own hand. A puppet reigned
three months as Murad V, and then, at the bidding of the same
king-makers whom his uncle had obeyed, left the throne free for his
brother Abdul Hamid, a man of affairs and ability, who was to be the
most conspicuous, or rather, the most notorious Osmanli sultan since
Suleiman.
6
_Relapse_
The new sultan, who had not expected his throne, found his realm in
perilous case. Nominally sovereign and a member of the Concert of
Europe, he was in reality a semi-neutralized dependant, existing, as an
undischarged bankrupt, on sufferance of the powers. Should the Concert
be dissolved, or even divided, and any one of its members be left free
to foreclose its Ottoman mortgages, the empire would be at an end.
Internally it was in many parts in open revolt, in all the rest
stagnant and slowly rotting. The thrice-foiled claimant to its
succession, who six years before had denounced the Black Sea clause of
the Treaty of Paris and so freed its hands for offence, was manifestly
preparing a fresh assault. Something drastic must be done; but what?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account