The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
This danger of the empire’s international situation, and also the
disgrace of it, had been evident for some time past to those who had
any just appreciation of affairs; and in the educated class, at any
rate, something like a public opinion, very apprehensive and very much
ashamed, had struggled into being. The discovery of a leader in Midhat
Pasha, former governor-general of Bagdad, and a king-maker of recent
notoriety, induced the party of this opinion to take precipitate
action. Murad had been deposed in August. Before the year was out
Midhat presented himself before Abdul Hamid with a formal demand for
the promulgation of a Constitution, proposing not only to put into
execution the pious hopes of the two Hatti Sherifs of Abdul Mejid but
also to limit the sovereign and govern the empire by representative
institutions. The new sultan, hardly settled on his uneasy throne,
could not deny those who had deposed his two predecessors, and,
shrewdly aware that ripe facts would not be long in getting the better
of immature ideas, accepted. A parliament was summoned; an electorate,
with only the haziest notions of what it was about, went through the
form of sending representatives to Constantinople; and the sittings
were inaugurated by a speech from the throne, framed on the most
approved Britannic model, the deputies, it is said, jostling and
crowding the while to sit, as many as possible, on the right, which
they understood was always the side of powers that be.
It is true this extemporized chamber never had a chance. The Russians
crossed the Pruth before it had done much more than verify its powers,
and the thoughts and energies of the Osmanlis were soon occupied with
the most severe and disastrous struggle in which the empire had ever
engaged. But it is equally certain that it could not have turned to
account any chance it might have had. Once more the ‘young men in a
hurry’ had snatched at the end of an evolution hardly begun, without
taking into account the immaturity of Osmanli society in political
education and political capacity. After suspension during the war, the
parliament was dissolved unregretted, and its creator was tried for his
life, and banished. In failing, however, Midhat left bad to become so
much worse that the next reformers would inevitably have a more
convinced public opinion behind them, and he had virtually destroyed
the power of Mahmud’s bureaucracy. If the only immediate effect was the
substitution of an unlimited autocracy, the Osmanli peoples would be
able thenceforward to ascribe their misfortunes to a single person,
meditate attack, on a single position, and dream of realizing some day
an ideal which had been definitely formulated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account