The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
To the races they conquered the Turks offered two alternatives—serfdom
or Turkdom; those who could not bring themselves to accept either of
these had either to emigrate or take to brigandage and outlawry in the
mountains. The Turks literally overlaid the European nationalities of
the Balkan peninsula for five hundred years, and from their own point
of view and from that of military history this was undoubtedly a very
splendid achievement; it was more than the Greeks or Romans had ever
done. From the point of view of humanitarianism also it is beyond a
doubt that much less human blood was spilt in the Balkan peninsula
during the five hundred years of Turkish rule than during the five
hundred years of Christian rule which preceded them; indeed it would
have been difficult to spill more. It is also a pure illusion to think
of the Turks as exceptionally brutal or cruel; they are just as
good-natured and good-humoured as anybody else; it is only when their
military or religious passions are aroused that they become more
reckless and ferocious than other people. It was not the Turks who
taught cruelty to the Christians of the Balkan peninsula; the latter
had nothing to learn in this respect.
In spite of all this, however, from the point of view of the Slavs of
Bulgaria and Serbia, Turkish rule was synonymous with suffocation. If
the Turks were all that their greatest admirers think them the history
of the Balkan peninsula in the nineteenth century would have been very
different from what it has been, namely, one perpetual series of
anti-Turkish revolts.
Of all the Balkan peoples the Bulgarians were the most completely
crushed and effaced. The Greeks by their ubiquity, their brains, and
their money were soon able to make the Turkish storm drive their own
windmill; the Rumanians were somewhat sheltered by the Danube and also
by their distance from Constantinople; the Serbs also were not so
exposed to the full blast of the Turkish wrath, and the inaccessibility
of much of their country afforded them some protection. Bulgaria was
simply annihilated, and its population, already far from homogeneous,
was still further varied by numerous Turkish and other Tartar colonies.
For the same reasons already mentioned Bulgaria was the last Balkan
state to emancipate itself; for these reasons also it is the least
trammelled by prejudices and by what are considered national
predilections and racial affinities, while its heterogeneous
composition makes it vigorous and enterprising. The treatment of the
Christians by the Turks was by no means always the same; generally
speaking, it grew worse as the power of the Sultan grew less. During
the fifteenth century they were allowed to practise their religion and
all their vocations in comparative liberty and peace. But from the
sixteenth century onwards the control of the Sultan declined, power
became decentralized, the Ottoman Empire grew ever more anarchic and
the rule of the provincial governors more despotic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account