The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
It is not too much to say, in summing up, that Russian influence, which
had been growing stronger in Bulgaria up till 1877-8, has since been
steadily on the decline; Germany and Austria-Hungary, who reduced
Bulgaria to half the size that Count Ignatiyev had made it by the
Treaty of San Stefano, reaped the benefit, especially the commercial
benefit, of the war which Russia had waged. Intellectually, and
especially as regards the replenishment and renovation of the Bulgarian
language, which, in spite of numerous Turkish words introduced during
the Ottoman rule, is essentially Slavonic both in substance and form,
Russian influence was especially powerful, and has to a certain extent
maintained itself. Economically, owing partly to geographical
conditions, both the Danube and the main oriental railway linking
Bulgaria directly with Budapest and Vienna, partly to the fact that
Bulgaria’s best customers for its cereals are in central and western
Europe, the connexion between Bulgaria and Russia is infinitesimal.
Politically, both Russia and Bulgaria aiming at the same thing, the
possession of Constantinople and the hegemony of the Balkan peninsula,
their relations were bound to be difficult.
The first Bulgarian Parliament met in 1879 under trying conditions.
Both Russian and Bulgarian hopes had been dashed by the Treaty of
Berlin. Russian influence was still paramount, however, and the viceroy
controlled the organization of the administration. An ultra-democratic
constitution was arranged for, a fact obviously not conducive to the
successful government of their country by the quite inexperienced
Bulgarians. For a ruler recourse had inevitably to be had to the
rabbit-warren of Germanic princes, who were still ingenuously
considered neutral both in religion and in politics. The choice fell on
Prince Alexander of Battenberg, nephew of the Empress of Russia, who
had taken part in the campaign of the Russian army. Prince Alexander
was conscientious, energetic, and enthusiastic, but he was no diplomat,
and from the outset his honesty precluded his success. From the very
first he failed to keep on good terms with Russia or its
representatives, who at that time were still numerous in Bulgaria,
while he was helpless to stem the ravages of parliamentary government.
The Emperor Alexander III, who succeeded his father Alexander II in
1881, recommended him to insist on being made dictator, which he
successfully did. But when he found that this only meant an increase of
Russian influence he reverted to parliamentary government (in September
1883); this procedure discomfited the representatives of Russia,
discredited him with the Emperor, and threw him back into the vortex of
party warfare, from which he never extricated himself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account