The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey — John Shaqi
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
Bulgaria was first in the field and had a considerable start of the
other two rivals. The Bulgars claimed the whole of Macedonia, including
Salonika and all the Aegean coast (except Chalcidice), Okhrida, and
Monastir; Greece claimed all southern Macedonia, and Serbia parts of
northern and central Macedonia known as Old Serbia. The crux of the
whole problem was, and is, that the claims of Serbia and Greece do not
clash, while that of Bulgaria, driving a thick wedge between Greece and
Serbia, and thus giving Bulgaria the undoubted hegemony of the
peninsula, came into irreconcilable conflict with those of its rivals.
The importance of this point was greatly emphasized by the existence of
the Nish-Salonika railway, which is Serbia’s only direct outlet to the
sea, and runs through Macedonia from north to south, following the
right or western bank of the river Vardar. Should Bulgaria straddle
that, Serbia would be economically at its mercy, just as in the north
it was already, to its bitter cost, at the mercy of Austria-Hungary.
Nevertheless, Bulgarian propaganda had been so effectual that Serbia
and Greece never expected they would eventually be able to join hands
so easily and successfully as they afterwards did.
The then unknown quantity of Albania was also a factor. This people,
though small in numbers, was formidable in character, and had never
been effectually subdued by the Turks. They would have been glad to
have a boundary contiguous with that of Bulgaria (with whom they had no
quarrel) as a support against their hereditary enemies, Serbs in the
north and Greeks in the south, who were more than inclined to encroach
on their territory. The population of Macedonia, being still under
Turkish rule, was uneducated and ignorant; needless to say it had no
national consciousness, though this was less true of the Greeks than of
the Slavs. It is the Slav population of Macedonia that has engendered
so much heat and caused so much blood to be spilt. The dispute as to
whether it is rather Serb or Bulgar has caused interminable and most
bitter controversy. The truth is that it _was_ neither the one nor the
other, but that, the ethnological and linguistic missionaries of
Bulgaria having been first in the field, a majority of the Macedonian
Slavs had been so long and so persistently told that they were Bulgars,
that after a few years Bulgaria could, with some truth, claim that this
fact was so.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account