The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
At this point again it is necessary to recall the position in regard to
this question of the various nations concerned. Great Britain and
France had no territorial stake in Turkey proper, and did their utmost
to secure reform not only in the _vilayets_ of Macedonia, but also in
the realm of Ottoman finance. Italy’s interest centred in Albania,
whose eventual fate, for geographical and strategic reasons, could not
leave it indifferent. Austria-Hungary’s only care was by any means to
prevent the aggrandizement of the Serb nationality and of Serbia and
Montenegro, so as to secure the control, if not the possession, of the
routes to Salonika, if necessary over the prostrate bodies of those two
countries which defiantly barred Germanic progress towards the East.
Russia was already fatally absorbed in the Far Eastern adventure, and,
moreover, had, ever since the war of 1878, been losing influence at
Constantinople, where before its word had been law; the Treaty of
Berlin had dealt a blow at Russian prestige, and Russia had ever since
that date been singularly badly served by its ambassadors to the Porte,
who were always either too old or too easy-going. Germany, on the other
hand, had been exceptionally fortunate or prudent in the choice of its
representatives. The general trend of German diplomacy in Turkey was
not grasped until very much later, a fact which redounds to the credit
of the German ambassadors at Constantinople. Ever since the triumphal
journey of William II to the Bosphorus in 1889, German influence, under
the able guidance of Baron von Radowitz, steadily increased. This
culminated in the régime of the late Baron Marschall von Bieberstein,
who was ambassador from 1897 to 1912. It was German policy to flatter,
support, and encourage Turkey in every possible way, to refrain from
taking part with the other powers in the invidious and perennial
occupation of pressing reforms on Abdul Hamid, and, above all, to give
as much pocket-money to Turkey and its extravagant ruler as they asked
for. Germany, for instance, refused to send officers or to have a
district assigned it in Macedonia in 1904, and declined to take part in
the naval demonstration off Mitylene in 1905. This attitude of Germany
naturally encouraged the Porte in its policy of delay and subterfuge,
and Turkey soon came to look on Germany as its only strong, sincere,
and disinterested friend in Europe. For the indefinite continuance of
chaos and bloodshed in Macedonia, after the other powers had really
braced themselves to the thankless task of putting the reforms into
practice, Germany alone was responsible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account