The Barb and the Bridle: A Handbook of Equitation for Ladies, and Manual of Instruction in the Science of Riding, from the Preparatory Suppling ExercisesHenderson, Robert, active 1866-1874
Science
The Barb and the Bridle: A Handbook of Equitation for Ladies, and Manual of Instruction in the Science of Riding, from the Preparatory Suppling Exercises
Henderson, Robert, active 1866-1874
Horsemanship
The reason is that the military trot is taught upon the principle of
balance. The man sits fair down on his seat, and, keeping his knee
forward and his heel well down, does not cling to the horse by muscular
grasp; consequently the bumping, so terrific to the eye of the civilian,
is scarcely felt by the soldier, and in continental armies, where rough
trotting horses are exceptional, the motion or jolt is scarcely
perceptible. There are a great many popular fallacies about military
riding--as, for instance, that a dragoon rides with a very long
stirrup; that his seat is insecure; that the bumping gives a horse a
sore back; and that, except a sailor and a tailor, a dragoon officer is
about the worst horseman to be found. This is not exactly the place to
enter into any controversy on the subject; but I may as well observe at
once, and I do so because I am sure the old soldiers are not altogether
despised by the ladies, even in this non-military country, that all the
foregoing are so many mistakes. A dragoon, any time within my memory,
rode just the same length as a man does over a country--that is to say
that, measuring the cavalry man's leather and iron by the length of his
arm and hand, which is the right length for a civilian, you have exactly
the cavalry regulation length. The stirrup of a lancer indeed is
somewhat shorter than that used by most hunting men. Finally, an
acquaintance with the _habitués_ of such places as Melton would prove to
unbelievers in the riding of cavalry officers that the names of most of
the men who go to the front in the hunting-field, and keep there, are to
be found in the "Army List." I have been tempted thus to digress by
having referred to the military riding school, from which in former
days, most, if not all, the riding masters who taught ladies came. Now,
although I stand up (as in duty bound) for the military system of riding
_per se_, it does not produce the right man to teach a woman to ride, if
the experience of the preceptor has been acquired in the riding school
only. Excellent as is our system (or, rather, the German system, for it
is imported from the Prussian service), for making a man a first-class
dragoon, as regards anything connected with a lady's seat or the
principle of her balance, it is useless.
As regards her hands, or the application of the "aids" of the _manége_,
it is highly beneficial, because nothing can be more clear or concise
than the simple rules laid down in military equitation for the
application of the "helps," by which a horse's easy movement is
controlled and regulated. It was principally to the want of men who
could teach a lady to ride, however, that the absence of a trotting in
the side saddle was to be attributed "lang syne."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account