The Baronial Halls, and Ancient Picturesque Edifices of England; Vol. 2 of 2Hall, S. C. (Samuel Carter)
History
The Baronial Halls, and Ancient Picturesque Edifices of England; Vol. 2 of 2
Hall, S. C. (Samuel Carter)
Historic buildings -- England
[34] That Sir Oliver impaired his paternal estates by entertaining
James I. is very certain. It is probable that the king was a frequent
visitor to the hospitable knight, inasmuch as Royston, his Majesty’s
hunting seat, was in the neighbourhood. The king’s first visit, in
1603, on his progress to take possession of the English throne, was a
costly one. “His Highnesse and his followers,” according to Stow, “with
all comers, had such entertainment as was not the like in any place
before; there was such plentie and varietis of meates and diversitie
of wines, and the sellars open at any man’s pleasure.” It is stated,
indeed, that Sir Oliver’s entertainment was “a greater feast than had
ever been given to a king by a subject”--a fact to which his Majesty
himself testified; for on parting from the brave old knight, he is
reported to have addressed him, “Merry mon, thou hast treated me better
than ony ane syn I left Edinbro.”
[35] The present master of the school is the Rev. Mr. Fell, an
accomplished scholar, and an enlightened gentleman, by whom we were
guided about the various objects of interest in and around the
venerable Town, and whose courtesies and attentions it is our pleasant
duty to acknowledge.
[36] Upon a similar occasion, it is related that he paid a visit to
his godfather-uncle at Ramsay; the sturdy old Royalist was firm to the
monarchy; and although his nephew treated him with so much respect as
to decline wearing his hat in his presence, he seized all his plate
for the public service, and afterwards compelled him to give forty
saddle-horses, “by way of fine.” Subsequently, however, when the whole
estates of Sir Oliver were sequestrated by the Parliament, the remnant
was restored to him by the intervention of Oliver--“for whose sake the
sequestration was taken off.” Notwithstanding, the aged knight died in
extreme poverty, in 1655, at the age of 93, and, it is said, was buried
by night, “to prevent the seizure of his body by his creditors.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account