The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to itBoyle, John, active 1867
History
The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to it
Boyle, John, active 1867
Ireland -- History -- War of 1689-1691
[37] "In April, 1783, Mr. Gardiner, afterwards Lord Mountjoy, remarked
in the Irish Parliament, in reference to the Irish Catholics, that
'England had America detached from her by force of Irish emigrants.'"
(Plowden's Hist. Rev., vol. iii., p. 45.)
[38] Macpherson's History of England, vol. i., p. 664.
[39] This force at the Battle of the Boyne was 10,000 men. Its
artillery was twelve pieces. It sustained little loss in that action,
and was now supplied with mortars.
[40] It is worthy of remark, that while Taylor represents the
atrocities perpetrated by the soldiery of the Prince, under his own
eye, as revolting as those of Douglas's troops, he endeavors to
palliate in the Prince what he execrates in the general. This is
to be regretted in a historian otherwise remarkable for candor and
impartiality.
[41] As the siege of 1690 did not affect that part of the city in the
County Clare, there is no necessity for further allusion to it here,
beyond stating that the bridge leading to it was called Thomond Bridge.
The other was called the City Bridge. King's Island is about two miles
in length.
[42] Story's map exhibits thirty-six guns and four mortars on the part
of the besiegers, and but seven on that of the besieged. But as the
fort on King's Island is represented to have caused great injury to
William's right, it is certain that there must have been guns on it;
hence the writer, and he thinks not without reason, has hazarded the
assertion in the text.
[43] See Haverty's History of Ireland, page 643--giving a Williamite
authority for this estimate. This work came to my notice too late to
make some corrections which, to a critical reader, might seem important.
[44] McGeoghagen's History.
[45] It is stated by some of the annalists that he lost two soldiers,
who fell behind, but the text is in accordance with the Abbé's account
of this adventure.
[46] The Duke of Berwick, at page 69 of his Memoirs, gives the width
of the breach at 100 toises, or 600 French feet,--the toise being six
French, or six and a half English feet--and as he was present at the
siege, his estimate is here adopted. Moreover, the breach, as exhibited
on a map in Story's Impartial History, lays bare a great portion of the
city, and shows the disposition of the Irish troops within it, which
a breach of thirty-six feet--the width generally accepted--could not
exhibit.
[47] See preceding footnote.
[48] William afterwards declared before Parliament, that the cause of
abandoning the siege was the continual rain that kept his trenches
filled with water, but the Duke of Berwick asserts that not a drop had
fallen during the time specified in the text.
[49] McGeoghegan's History of Ireland, Preliminary Discourse, p. 24.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account