The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to it — John Shaqi
The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to itBoyle, John, active 1867
History
The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to it
Boyle, John, active 1867
Ireland -- History -- War of 1689-1691
All these acts were known to be so just and salutary, that it was
hoped they would at once meet the unanimous approval of the English
king and his council. But they were all, or nearly all, negatived by
the council; and the king himself, though he gave his assent to all
the others, rejected that repealing the law of Poyning. It had met
with great opposition in the upper house of the Irish Parliament, for
though it was a law which placed Ireland under the complete legislative
control of England, there was in the "higher estate" then, as to-day,
a spirit of subserviency to the English interest, and the king was
as jealous of his royal prerogatives as any of his predecessors. But
this act was afterwards repealed, when nearly one hundred years more
of bitter experience had proved its ruinous effect on the country,
and eighteen years of unparalleled prosperity was the consequence.
This subject is, however, out of the course of our narrative, and is
only referred to as showing that the repeal of Poyning's law did not
originate with Grattan or the volunteers of 1782, but had been the
principal object of the statesmen of ante-Jacobite times, as the repeal
of the Union has been in our own days.
No body of legislators ever understood the wants of a country better
than that parliament did the necessities of Ireland. And well might
they understand them, for their impoverished country and broken
fortunes bore striking and melancholy evidence of the evil effects of
foreign legislation aided by a subsidized native oligarchy inimical
to every interest but their own. For three generations the people
had known no respite from robbery and proscription. Over two hundred
thousand of them had passed into exile, or had been consigned to
penal servitude in the colonies within the last fifty years. Then,
as to-day, the population, though small, was deemed "surplus," while
outlawry and banishment suppressed all manifestations of a national
spirit. The chiefs were detached from their clans, and the clans,
in losing their former protectors, had found but deadly enemies in
their new taskmasters. The old feudal system was nearly extinct,
even in the districts least visited by English adventure, and this
Parliament had realized the stern necessity of reconstructing a nation
out of the elements at its disposal. The troubles that surrounded the
king gave it a temporary power, which it wielded for the removal of
grievances becoming chronic in the land, but "no act of a proscriptive
or retaliatory character stains the parliamentary records of that
period."[6]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account