The Bay State Monthly — Volume 1, No. 6, June, 1884 — John Shaqi
The Bay State Monthly — Volume 1, No. 6, June, 1884Various
History
The Bay State Monthly — Volume 1, No. 6, June, 1884
Various
Massachusetts -- Periodicals; New England -- Periodicals
The incorporation of Nashobah on November 2, 1714, settled many of the
disputes connected with the lands; but on December 3 of the next year,
the name was changed from Nashobah to Littleton. As already stated, the
plan of the original Groton grant had never been returned by the
proprietors to the General Court for confirmation, and this neglect had
acted to their prejudice. After Littleton had been set off, the town of
Groton undertook to repair the injury and make up the loss. John Shepley
and John Ames were appointed agents to bring about the necessary
confirmation by the General Court. It is an interesting fact to know
that in their petition (General Court Records, x, 216, February 11,
1717, in the office of the secretary of state) they speak of having in
their possession at that time the original plan of the town, made by
Danforth in the year 1668, though it was somewhat defaced. In the
language of the Records, it was said to be "with the Petitioner," which
expression in the singular number may have been intentional, referring
to John Shepley, probably the older one, as certainly the more
influential, of the two agents. This plan was also exhibited before the
General Court on June 18, 1713, according to the Records (ix, 263) of
that date.
The case, as presented by the agents, was as follows:--
A petition of John Sheply & John Ames Agents for the Town of Groton
Shewing that the General Assembly of the Province did in the year
1655, Grant unto M'r Dean Winthrop & his Associates a Tract of Land
of Eight miles quare for a Plantation to be called by the name of
Groton, that Thom's & Jonathan Danforth did in the year 1668, lay
out the said Grant, but the Plat thereof through Neglect was not
returned to the Court for Confirmation that the said Plat thô
something defaced is with the Petitioner, That in the Year 1713 M'r
Samuel Danforth Surveyour & Son of the abovesaid Jonathan Danforth,
at the desire of the said Town of Groton did run the Lines & make
an Implatment of the said Township laid out as before & found it
agreeable to the former. W'h. last Plat the Petitioners do herewith
exhibit, And pray that this Hon'ble Court would allow & confirm the
same as the Township of Groton.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account