A manuscript plan of Dunstable, made by Joseph Blanchard, in the autumn of 1748, and accompanying these papers among the Archives (cxv, 519), has considerable interest for the local antiquary. In the course of a few years some of these Groton signers reconsidered the matter, and changed their minds. It appears from the following communication that the question of the site of the meeting-house had some influence in the matter:-- Groton, May 10, 1753. We have concluded to Joine with Dunstable in settling the gospell and all other affairs hart & hand in case Dunstable woud meet us in erecting a meting house in center of Lands or center of Travel. Joseph Spaulding jr. John Swallow. Timothy Read. Samuel Cumings. Joseph Parkhurst. [Nason's History of Dunstable, page 85.] The desired result of annexation was now brought about, and in this way Joint Grass became a part and portion of Dunstable. The following extracts give further particulars in regard to it:-- A Petition of a Committee in Behalf of the Inhabitants of _Dunstable_, within this Province, shewing, that that Part of _Dunstable_ by the late running of the Line is small, and the Land much broken, unable to support the Ministry, and other necessary Charges; that there is a small Part of _Groton_ contiguous, and well situated to be united to them in the same Incorporation, lying to the West and Northwest of them; that in the Year 1744, the Inhabitants there requested them that they might be incorporated with them, which was conceeded to by the Town of _Groton_; that in Consequence of this, upon Application to this Court they were annexed to the Town of _Dunstable_ with the following Proviso, viz. "That within one Year from that Time a House for the publick Worship of GOD should be erected at a certain Place therein mentioned": Which Place was esteemed by all Parties both in _Groton_ and _Nottingham_, so incommodious, that it was not complied withal; that on a further Application to this Court to alter the Place, Liberty was given to the Inhabitants of _Groton_ and _Nottingham_, to withdraw, whereby they are deprived of that contiguous and necessary Assistance which they expected: Now as the Reasons hold good in every Respect for their Incorporation with them, they humbly pray that the said Inhabitants of _Groton_ by the same Bounds as in the former Order stated, may be reannexed to them, for the Reasons mentioned. Read and _Ordered_, That the Petitioners serve the Inhabitants of _Groton_ therein refer'd to, as also the Clerk of the Town of _Groton_, with Copies of this Petition, that so the said Inhabitants, as also the Town of _Groton_, shew Cause, if any they have, on the first Tuesday of the next _May_ Session, why the Prayer thereof should not be granted. Sent up for Concurrence. [Journal of the House of Representatives (pages 138, 139), April 4, 1753.]