The Beaked Whales of the Family Ziphiidae: An Account of the Beaked Whales of the Family Ziphiidae in the Collection of the United States Museum...True, Frederick W. (Frederick William)
Science
The Beaked Whales of the Family Ziphiidae: An Account of the Beaked Whales of the Family Ziphiidae in the Collection of the United States Museum...
True, Frederick W. (Frederick William)
Beaked whales
... 49 56 54 80 46
foramen magnum
Length of [c]651 [ij]470 543 [i]464 ... 639 640 560 ...
mandible
Length of 237 241 162 ... ... 212 220 160 ...
symphysis
Greatest depth 106 114 92 102 116 110 97 95 ...
of mandible
[a] The size of the teeth makes it quite certain that it is an adult
female.
[b] End of beak broken off about 30 mm. from tip.
[c] Right side. Add 31 mm. for breakage.
[d] In median line.
[e] At middle.
[f] Between “suprafrontal processes of max.”
[g] Grieg’s fig., p. 18, shows 44 mm.
[h] From Grieg’s fig., p. 18.
[i] “Length of ramus.” Length of mandible=699 mm.
[j] In Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, vol. 26, 1872, p. 776.
MESOPLODON DENSIROSTRIS (Blainville)?
_Delphinus densirostris_ Blainville, Nouv. Dict. Hist. Nat., 2d ed.,
vol. 9, 1817, p. 178.
_Ziphius seychellensis_ Gray, Zoöl. _Erebus and Terror_, 1846, p. 28.
The skull of the specimen from Annisquam, Mass., (Pl. 1, fig. 2) is, I
regret to say, in rather poor condition. It is broken in the left orbital
region, and all the bones, especially those of the beak, are warped by
weathering. The proximal extremity of the left premaxilla is lacking and
also the tip of the beak.
The skull is obviously that of a young animal, as all the sutures are
open and the surface of the occipital condyles is pitted, owing to
imperfect ossification.
Although the dimensions of the skull, with a few exceptions, agree well
with those of young specimens of _M. bidens_, as shown by the foregoing
table (p. 8), certain differences stand out conspicuously. The most
salient of these is the depth of the beak as a whole and the depth and
shape of the rostral portion of the premaxillæ. The latter portion of the
premaxillæ instead of being low, with a straight inferior margin, is very
high, with the inferior margin strongly convex. At the middle of the beak
the premaxillæ are higher than the maxillæ on which they rest. It is true
that the shape of the beak varies greatly with age in _bidens_ and other
species of _Mesoplodon_, but I do not find any evidence that such a
change as is here indicated takes place in _bidens_. The form of the beak
and of the rostral portion of the premaxillæ is that of _M.
densirostris_.
The beak is almost as broad at the base as in _bidens_, but the lateral
free margin of the maxilla anterior to the anteorbital notch instead of
continuing along the side of the beak nearly to the tip, as in _bidens_,
ends at a point about 90 mm. in front of the line of the notch, beyond
which the sides of the beak are vertical.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account