The Beaver, Vol. 1, No. 05, February, 1921Hudson's Bay Company
History
The Beaver, Vol. 1, No. 05, February, 1921
Hudson's Bay Company
Canada -- History -- Periodicals; Canada, Northern -- History -- Periodicals; Hudson's Bay Company -- Periodicals
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
We Cannot Stand Still
By J. M. GIBSON
General Manager, Calgary Retail
_IF there is no forward movement, we must slide back, as the power of
gravity ever grips where motion has ceased. The business, great or
small, that comes to a stand-still with a smile of self-satisfaction
is heading for the shelf of dry rot. Every business must strive in
its present year to beat that of the past, to beat the turnover, the
service, the public good-will and the net results. The very strife
after these ends develops the initiative, broadens the aspect and
reproduces better men; therefore do not hesitate, never stop, but
always keep climbing._
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
How Shipping Rates on Goods Affect Stores' Salespower
_What Change Should be Made in Proposed New Freight Classification (No.
17)?_
By J. BROWN
_Editor's Note._--_A circular letter, dated, 7th January,
from one of the best organized trade associations of Canada,
indicates that meetings are to be held soon to consider the
application of the proposed new freight classification (No.
17)._
THE latterday high cost of transportation so vitally affects the
salespower of the Company's department stores (as well as other
wholesale or retail stores in Western Canada) that favourable
groupings of certain classes of goods under the proposed new freight
classification (No. 17) are considered important in view of the
Company's great problem of distribution.
While the new schedule is under consideration, H.B.C. traffic men
will see the advantage of working to secure a spread of _two classes_
between less-than-carload and full carload ratings on drygoods. It is
reported also that every effort will be made to convince carriers that
certain lines of drygoods should be listed separately or in greatly
restricted groups, instead of being carried, as at present, under
extensive groups. It is apparent that an important saving for H.B.C.
stores would result from such re-classification in view of the 35 per
cent. difference between first and third class and first and second
class ratings.
Under the proposed new freight classification (No. 17), certain
drygoods shipped in carlots will take a _second class_ rate. The
present classification (No. 16) on such drygoods gives no advantage in
rate for carloads.
Why classification No. 17 (under consideration) proposes to allow
a difference of only one class between L.C.L. and carloads of this
commodity is not clear, inasmuch as for other lines of goods a
difference of _two classes_ is allowed when shipped by the carload.
Drygoods certainly should be entitled to take _third class_ rate in
carloads.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account