Child development; Infant psychology; Motor ability in children
Recent psychologists have shown strong reason for thinking that such
acts as this are at bottom only the same old hit and miss trick that
we have seen from the first, of repeating lucky movements; only in
a higher stage, as the associations that guide the movements become
more delicate and complicated, and memory and imagination enter in.
However this may be as a matter of theoretic analysis, there is in
practice a clear test of difference between the unintelligent earlier
type of actions and those that all agree in calling intelligent: I have
indicated it above, in saying that in intelligent action one’s own wit
must be used “in novel circumstances.” The case must be such that one
cannot fall back on race instinct nor on his own previous habit.
Our baby, for instance, first used her intelligence to steer her toe
into her mouth, and the way she did it, compared with the way she
slowly settled on the proper movements for getting her rattle into her
mouth, shows clearly the practical difference between unintelligent
and intelligent action, even if both are at bottom made of the same
psychological stuff.
It was just before the sixth month began that the baby accomplished
this feat, but it belongs with the developments of that month. She was
already fond of playing with her toes; and sitting unclad that evening
in her mother’s lap, she first tried to pull them straight to her
mouth. This was, of course, the mere repetition of a frequent movement,
learned by simple association. But when it failed--for the toes would
kick away, just as her arms used to do, carrying the thumb from her
lips--the little one put her mind on corralling them. She took them in
one hand, clasped the other hand about her instep, and so brought the
foot safely up. Still it escaped, and at last she clasped ankle and
heel firmly, one with each hand, and after several attempts brought the
elusive toe triumphantly into her mouth. It is true that by looking up
to us for sympathy in her success, and relaxing attention, she promptly
lost it once more; but she recaptured it, and from this time on, for
weeks, had immense satisfaction in it every time she was undressed.
There may have been a certain element of instinct in this--getting the
toe to the mouth is so persistent a habit with babies that it seems
as if there must be some inheritance about it; but inheritance could
hardly have given the special devices for managing the insubordinate
foot; there was clearly some use of individual intelligence. All
through the process of learning to manage the body, the baby showed
instinct and intelligence most intricately mingled; and, indeed, we do
so ourselves our lives long.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account