Child development; Infant psychology; Motor ability in children
Professor Preyer complains of teaching babies mere tricks, which have
no real relation to their development; and certainly it is a sound rule
that self-unfolding, not teaching, is the way in which a baby should
develop in the earliest years. But Preyer’s baby learned to wave his
hand, and play “patacake,” and show “How big is baby?” and the rest of
it, just as other babies do; mammas and nurses cannot resist it. And as
long as the babies like it, I do not see that it can do any harm, if it
is not overdone. Besides, it may be said that these standard tricks are
all closely related to the sign language, and so fall in well with the
natural development at this stage. And again, the extreme teachability
of the human child is his great superiority over the brute--all our
civilization rests on it; and when the time comes that he is capable of
receiving training, it may be as well that his power of doing so should
be used a little, and that these simple gesture tricks of immemorial
nursery tradition are good exercises to begin with. It is possible to
make a fetich of “self-development,” beyond all common sense.
At all events, as our baby approached seven months old, her mamma had
begun to teach her to wave by-by. For a couple of weeks, the mother
would hold up the little hand and wave it at the departing guest, and
before long the baby would give a feeble waggle or two after her mother
had let go; next, she would need only to be started; and a week after
she was seven months old she waved a spontaneous farewell as I left the
room. There was a long history of the gesture after that, for it was
lost and regained, confused with other hand tricks and straightened
out, and altogether played a considerable part in the story of sign
language and of memory, which I shall not have time to relate. But
at all times it paid for itself in the delight it gave the baby: it
reconciled her to almost any parting, and even to going to bed.
Her objection to going to bed, which had been evident since the fifth
month, was because she thought sleeping was a waste of good playtime,
not because she had any associations of fear and repugnance connected
with it. She had never been left to cry herself to sleep alone, but was
rocked and sung to in good old fashion. But she did show signs at this
time of timidity and distress in waking from sleep, clinging piteously
to her mother and crying. She had waked and cried alone a number of
times, and, as I have already said, she seemed to have formed some
associations of fear in this way. But I think there were deeper reasons
for the confused distress on waking, which from now until halfway
through the third year appeared at times.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account