_G. Sylvatica._ Length 12 inches, expanse 19, flexure 6¹⁄₂, tail 4,
rictus 1, tarsus 1¹⁄₂, middle toe 1¹⁄₁₀. Irides blood-red; orbits
grey, edge of eyelids scarlet; beak reddish-black; feet pale flesh
colour, front of tarsi and of toes, pink, claws blackish, small and
blunt. Head high and sub-conical; feathers of occiput projecting
and overhanging the neck, as if a notch had been cut with scissors;
or still more, as if the head were covered with a hood which hung
down behind. Forehead blackish grey, softening into a brownish
tint behind: below the eye and ear is a large undefined patch of
buff; chin of same hue; the rest of head, throat, neck, breast,
and belly, bluish-grey; the whole neck richly glossed with pale
crimson, changing to brassy-green, especially behind, where the
feathers meet in a sharp ridge. Abruptly separated from the neck, a
broad belt of dark red extends from each shoulder across the back,
reflecting the richest purple. The remainder of back, rump, tail,
and wing-secondaries and tertiaries, deep-sea-green, or black,
according to the light, glossed with rich purple: on the secondary
and primary coverts, the green merges into a dark bistre: primaries
bright chestnut, with black shafts and tips. Inner surface of
wings, thighs, lower belly, vent and under tail-coverts, chestnut.
No description can give an adequate notion of the lustrous radiance
of this most lovely bird; though it has not yet found a place in
our Ornithologies. I presume it to be the “_Columba silvatica major
nigro-cærulescens_,” of Browne’s Jamaica, p. 468, but he has given
no description; his “Mountain Witch, Mountain Partridge, or Mountain
Dove,” is doubtless the bird described in the following article. Mr.
Selby, in his beautiful volume on the Pigeons, in the Nat. Lib., named,
without characterising, the genus _Geophilus_, which, while he applied
it with confidence to _Carunculatus_ and _Nicobaricus_, he assigned
doubtingly to the larger ground doves of Cuba and Jamaica. But these
species have no generic identity; nor if they had, could this name be
adopted, as it had been previously used for a genus of _Myriapoda_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account