The blight of Asia : $b An account of the systematic extermination of Christian populations by Mohammedans and of the culpability of certain great powers; with the true story of the burning of SmyrnaHorton, George
History
The blight of Asia : $b An account of the systematic extermination of Christian populations by Mohammedans and of the culpability of certain great powers; with the true story of the burning of Smyrna
Horton, George
Christians -- Turkey; Fires -- Turkey -- İzmir; Greeks -- Turkey; Turkey; İzmir (Turkey) -- History
The part played by Italy and France which so greatly contributed to the
extermination of the Christian population of Turkey, and the fearful
events at Smyrna, are well summed up by George Abbott in the work above
referred to, in the following words:
“France, who since the Armistice had displayed a keen jealousy
of England’s place in a part of the world in which she claims
special rights, presently concluded a separate agreement with
Turkey—an example in which she was followed by Italy—and gave
the Turks her moral and material support against the Greeks;
while England, while refusing to reverse her policy in favor of
their enemies, contented herself with giving the Greeks only a
Platonic encouragement, which they were unwise enough to take
for more than it was worth.”
CHAPTER XXVII
THE BRITISH CONTRIBUTION
Unfortunately, I am restrained from writing many interesting facts
connected with a history of this kind; some of the things that came to
my knowledge in my official capacity. To the honor of Great Britain,
however, I believe that there were moments when she came within a hair’s
breadth of living up to her best traditions. What prevented her at the
critical moment, I have never learned.
At any rate, the British contribution to the Smyrna horror did not
consist in active aid of the Turks, neither did she furnish them with
arms or munitions. But, though she was largely responsible for the
landing of the Greeks in Asia Minor, and the latter were defending
her interests, she afforded them no aid, but gave them fallacious
encouragement which led them to their doom. As far as England was
concerned, Greece was the victim of British internal politics which
seized upon the government’s policy in the Near East as an object
for attack. If Lloyd George was pro-Greek, his political opponents
became—_ipso facto_—rabid pro-Turk. If the Hellenic soldiers were mere
tools of the British, as both the Italians and French believed, then it
certainly was not “playing the game” to desert them in their extremity;
and this desertion carries a graver responsibility with it, inasmuch as
it made possible the fearful catastrophe of Smyrna and its hinterland.
CHAPTER XXVIII
TURKISH INTERPRETATION OF AMERICA’S ATTITUDE
Of our American responsibility for the destruction of the Christians of
the Near East, I write with great hesitation and sorrow and must confine
myself to the statement of certain universally known facts.
The days and months leading up to the fearful events at Smyrna were noisy
with the Chester concession and pro-Turk propaganda. The enthusiastic
pro-Turk articles in the press of the two Chesters—father and son—are
still fresh in the public memory. Other pro-Turk and anti-Christian
writers were busy, some among them doubtless earning their daily bread.
The Turks were in funds. They had been busy picking the bones of the
Christians and had laid their hands on great sums.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account