The blight of Asia : $b An account of the systematic extermination of Christian populations by Mohammedans and of the culpability of certain great powers; with the true story of the burning of SmyrnaHorton, George
History
The blight of Asia : $b An account of the systematic extermination of Christian populations by Mohammedans and of the culpability of certain great powers; with the true story of the burning of Smyrna
Horton, George
Christians -- Turkey; Fires -- Turkey -- İzmir; Greeks -- Turkey; Turkey; İzmir (Turkey) -- History
The shrewd Europeanized group of Turks who inhabit Constantinople overdid
themselves in the courtesies and hospitality which they lavished on
foreign diplomats. This sort of Oriental is the most plausible and
fascinating man in the world. The educated hanum, also, is extremely
charming, and has a seductive grace that is hardly granted to her alien
sisters. If a few of them take off their veils and show their lovely
faces in Constantinople, they have little difficulty in persuading
diplomats that they are emancipated and that polygamy is a thing of the
past among Mohammedans; that the Greeks burned Smyrna, that a million and
a half Christians practically committed suicide and were not actually
massacred, or anything else they wish.
What can one do but believe when he is taken back to the days of
Haroun-al-Raschid, and floats off to a palace perfumed with roses of
Cashmere on an enchanted carpet?
Our representative at Constantinople, Admiral Mark L. Bristol, is an
extremely attractive personality: honest, brave, generous, with frank
and winning manners. By the sheer magnetism of his genial and engaging
character he gathers about himself, wherever he is, a school of admirers
and disciples who ardently defend the admiral and everything that he
thinks and does.
The naval officers who came to Smyrna at the Consulate’s request were
typical of the American naval officer in general, high-type intelligent
gentlemen, of an efficiency that may be described as well-nigh perfect.
They were under certain orders at Smyrna which it was incumbent upon
them to carry out. They accomplished all their duties there thoroughly
and correctly and performed prodigies after the fire in saving refugees.
I was somewhat puzzled, however, when an American lady at Smyrna informed
me that one of the officers had told her that he was “pro-Turk.” Another,
a commander, made the same remark at Athens, at luncheon, during one of
the trips which the destroyers were making back and forth between that
city and Smyrna.
While stopping at the Army and Navy Club in Washington in 1922, I asked
a naval officer of high rank if it was true that he was pro-Turk, and he
replied:
“Yes, I am, because I was brought up as a boy to the belief
that the Turks were always chasing Greeks and Armenians around
with a knife. Well, I have been over there to Constantinople
several times and I have never seen anything of the kind, so I
have come to the conclusion that it is all buncombe.”
This is all right. Every man is entitled to his opinions, no matter on
what evidence or process of reasoning founded. My surprise was due to the
fact that I had thought that the officers who came to Smyrna were under
orders to be neutral.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account