The blight of Asia : $b An account of the systematic extermination of Christian populations by Mohammedans and of the culpability of certain great powers; with the true story of the burning of SmyrnaHorton, George
History
The blight of Asia : $b An account of the systematic extermination of Christian populations by Mohammedans and of the culpability of certain great powers; with the true story of the burning of Smyrna
Horton, George
Christians -- Turkey; Fires -- Turkey -- İzmir; Greeks -- Turkey; Turkey; İzmir (Turkey) -- History
At any rate, it is not probable that great sums of American capital will
flow into Turkey under present conditions. Whatever public sentiment
may be, or whatever apathy may exist as to the fate of some millions of
our fellow creatures, who howl annoyingly when they are massacred or if
their families are torn apart, or if they are robbed of homes, capital is
cautious; it does not believe in railroads built in a country of ruined
cities, nor does it connect massacre with prosperity and progress.
And in all this tangle of conflicting interests, during which the
Turk continued massacring, the thoughtful observer is impressed with
one thing—the clearness of John Bull’s vision and the directness and
tenacity of his purpose; he knew what he wanted and he took it. There are
copious oil wells at Maidan i Naftun, from which the oil is piped down
to Mukamra, not far from Basra, on the Persian Gulf, where the British
landed early in the war. There are rich oil fields at Mousul. General
Townsend was on his way there when the Turks stopped him at Kut el Mara,
but that did not stop Cousin John. He is at Mousul now and the Turks
would have liked to give Mousul to Admiral Chester and the others. No
wonder the State Department says that it kept out of that.
CHAPTER XXIX
THE MAKING OF MUSTAPHA KHEMAL
The building up of Mustapha Khemal by certain Christian countries was one
of the unwisest, most pernicious and most dangerous deeds that Occidental
diplomacy, intrigue and jealousy has ever perpetrated. It is a legend
among Mohammedan peoples that the Turk is the “Sword of Allah,” “the
Defender of Islam,” and “the Scourge of the Unbeliever.” As he is the
lowest of Mohammedans intellectually, with none, or at best few, of the
graces and accomplishments of civilization, with no cultural history, the
other disciples of the Prophet do not consider him as their intellectual
or moral equal.
In only one particular has he always kept abreast of the age, and that
is in the art of war. He is perhaps the only example of a great and
scientifically warlike nation that is great in nothing else. He destroys
but can not construct. Even the other Mohammedans who have been subjected
to his rude and blighting sway, have continually fought to be freed from
it, and have only joined him in common cause against the Christians.
Of him, the historian Butler says:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account