The blight of Asia : $b An account of the systematic extermination of Christian populations by Mohammedans and of the culpability of certain great powers; with the true story of the burning of SmyrnaHorton, George
History
The blight of Asia : $b An account of the systematic extermination of Christian populations by Mohammedans and of the culpability of certain great powers; with the true story of the burning of Smyrna
Horton, George
Christians -- Turkey; Fires -- Turkey -- İzmir; Greeks -- Turkey; Turkey; İzmir (Turkey) -- History
I was sitting in the ward room of one of our destroyers moored in the
harbor of Smyrna. At a moment when the massacre had begun to assume
alarming proportions, a newspaper correspondent, a passenger on the same
naval unit, entered the room, opened his typewriter and began to write.
When he had finished about half a page, he read it carefully, took it
out of the machine, and said: “I can’t send this stuff. It’ll queer me
at Constantinople. I must get busy on Greek atrocities.” I have often
wondered what he meant. I was sitting quite close to him and heard him
very distinctly.
Let us briefly review the situation which enabled the Turks in the year
of our Lord, 1922, to complete the extinction of Christianity in the
Near East: The Germans were, as long as they lasted, the active allies
of the Turks, and during this period nearly a million Armenians and many
thousands of Greeks perished; after the Armistice and during the period
which led up to the destruction of Smyrna and the accompanying massacre,
the French and Italians were allies of the Turk, and furnished him
moral and material support; the British gave no aid to the Greeks, but
contented themselves with publishing an account of the dreadful events
that had been taking place in the Ottoman Empire; the Americans gained
the reputation of being pro-Turk, true friends, who would ultimately, on
account of this friendship, be given the permission to put through great
schemes which would result in the development of the Ottoman Empire and,
incidentally, fill certain American pocketbooks. The Turks confidently
believed that commercial avarice would prevent us from interfering with
their savagery, or even strongly condemning it.
Never in the world had the Turk so good an opportunity to glut his lust
for Christian blood without fear of interference or criticism.
The first Lausanne Conference closed, after reaching no agreement, on
February 7, 1923, and the second opened on April twenty-third of the same
year. On April tenth, still of the same year, the National Assembly at
Angora ratified the Chester Concession. As the terms of this concession
conflicted sharply with British and French interests, the date of its
ratification is highly suggestive.
This concession is dead now, and there was never enough in it to cause a
serious row between the United States and any European power. The State
Department has denied the official support of this scheme and must be
believed. This, however, has not prevented a general conviction in Turkey
that it was a project under the especial protection of the American
Government. Such a belief is very easy to create in Turkey, where even
the Mission Schools are popularly supposed to be government institutions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account