Communism -- Soviet Union; Europe -- Social conditions -- 20th century; Socialism; World War, 1914-1918
On the other hand, the War with its armies of millions, and its hellish
weapons of destruction can exhaust not only society’s resources but also
the moral forces of the proletariat. If it does not meet inner
resistance, this War may last for several years more, with changing
fortunes on both sides, until the chief belligerents are completely
exhausted. But then the whole fighting energy of the international
proletariat, brought to the surface by the bloody conspiracy of
imperialism, will be completely consumed in the horrible work of mutual
annihilation. The outcome would be that our entire civilization would
be set back by many decades. A peace resulting not from the will of the
awakened peoples but from the mutual exhaustion of the belligerents,
would be like the peace with which the Balkan War was concluded; it
would be a Bucharest Peace extended to the whole of Europe.
Such a peace would seek to patch up anew the contradictions, antagonisms
and deficiencies that have led to the present War. And with many other
things, the Socialist work of two generations would vanish in a sea of
blood without leaving a trace behind.
Which of the two prospects is the more probable? This cannot possibly
be theoretically determined in advance. The issue depends entirely upon
the activity of the vital forces of society--above all upon the
revolutionary Social Democracy.
"_Immediate cessation of the War_" is the watchword under which the
Social Democracy can reassemble its scattered ranks, both within the
national parties, and in the whole International. The proletariat
cannot make its will to peace dependent upon the strategic
considerations of the general staffs. On the contrary, it must oppose
its desire for peace to these military considerations. What the warring
governments call a struggle for national self-preservation is in reality
a mutual national annihilation. Real national self-defense now consists
in the struggle for peace.
Such a struggle for peace means for us not only a fight to save
humanity’s material and cultural possessions from further insane
destruction. It is for us primarily a fight to preserve the
revolutionary energy of the proletariat.
To assemble the ranks of the proletariat in a fight for peace means
again to place the forces of revolutionary Socialism against raging,
tearing imperialism on the whole front.
The conditions upon which peace should be concluded--the peace of the
peoples themselves, and not the reconciliation of the diplomats--must be
the same for the whole International.
NO CONTRIBUTIONS.
THE RIGHT OF EVERY NATION
TO SELF-DETERMINATION.
THE UNITED STATES OF
EUROPE--WITHOUT MONARCHIES,
WITHOUT STANDING ARMIES,
WITHOUT RULING FEUDAL
CASTES, WITHOUT SECRET DIPLOMACY.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account