The Bombay City Police: A Historical Sketch, 1672-1916Edwardes, S. M. (Stephen Meredyth)
History
The Bombay City Police: A Historical Sketch, 1672-1916
Edwardes, S. M. (Stephen Meredyth)
Crime -- India -- Mumbai; Police -- India -- Mumbai
--------+----------------+-----------------+------------------
Period | | | Constable
of | Senior | Junior | or
Office | Magistrate | Magistrate | Supdt. of Police
--------+----------------+-----------------+------------------
1829-33 | J. D. de Vitré | H. Gray | José Antonio.
1834 | J. Warden | Do. | Do.
| | +------------------
| | | Supdt. of Police
| | +------------------
1835-39 | J. Warden | H. Willis | Capt. Shortt
1840 | J. Warden | E. F. Danvers | Capt. Burrows
1841-45 | P. W. Le Geyt | Do. | Do.
1846 | G. L. Farrant | Do. | Capt. W. Curtis
1847-48 | G. Grant | Do. | Do.
1849 | Do. | Do. | Capt. E. Baynes
1850-51 | A. Spens | Do. | Do.
1852-53 | Do. | L. C. C. Rivett | Do.
1854-55 | A. K. Corfield | T. Thornton | Do.
--------+----------------+-----------------+------------------
It will be apparent from this list that from 1835 to 1855 the executive
control of the Police force was entrusted to a series of junior officers
belonging to the Company’s military forces, who probably possessed little
or no aptitude for police work, were poorly paid for their services,
and had no real encouragement to make their mark in civil employ.
Consequently, despite increased expenditure on the force, these military
Superintendents of Police secured very little control over the criminal
classes, and effected no real improvement in the _morale_ of their
subordinates. In 1844, for example, a succession of daring robberies was
carried out in the Harbour by gangs of criminals, who sailed round in
boats from Back Bay. The most notorious of them was known as the Bandar
Gang[54]; and their unchecked excesses led to the formation of a separate
floating police-force under the control of a Deputy Superintendent on Rs.
500 a month. House-breaking was of daily occurrence in Colaba, Sonapur,
Kalbadevi and Girgaum,[55] and constant complaints of dishonesty among
the European constables and of the gross inefficiency of the native rank
and file were made to the authorities by both public bodies and private
residents.[56] Corruption was prevalent in all ranks of the force,
and most of the subordinate officers, both European and Indian, were
in secret collusion with agents and go-betweens, some of them members
of the higher Hindu castes, who assisted their acts of extortion and
blackmail and shared with them the proceeds of their venality. Bands of
ruffians infested the thoroughfares and lanes of the native city, and no
respectable resident dared venture unprotected into the streets after
nightfall.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account