I prefer to note here quainter and humbler memorials. James had a
curious, if fitful, interest in art and letters. The picturesque
Pitscottie boldly affirms him “ane singular guid chirurgione.” In the
book of the royal expenses we have some curious entries. A fine pair of
teeth had an unholy attraction for him. He would have them out, on any
or no pretext. “Item, ane fellow because the King pullit furtht his
teith, xviii shillings.” “Item, to Kynnard, ye barbour, for twa teith
drawn furtht of his hed be the King, xviii sh.” History does not record
what the “fellow” or the “barbour” said on the subject, or whether they
were contented with the valuation of their grinders, which was far from
excessive since the computation is in Scots money, wherein a shilling
only equalled an English penny. The barber, moreover, according to the
practice of the time, was a rival artist, but—speculation is vain;
though it will be observed that instead of the patients feeing the Royal
physician, they were themselves feed to submit to treatment. This same
Lindsay of Pitscottie is also our authority for another story to the
full as quaint. James desired to know the original language of mankind.
He procured him two children—human waifs and strays were plentiful in
old Scotland; provided them with a dumb woman for nurse, and plumped the
three down on Inchkeith, that tiny islet in the Forth a little way out
from Leith. Our chronicler is dubious as to the result. “Some say they
spak guid Hebrew, but I know not by authoris rehearse.” The “guid
Hebrew,” if it ever existed, died with them. Nor is there any trace of a
Scots Yiddish, a compound whereof you shudder at the bare conception.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account