of.” “Oh,” replied the lady, “bring him here as much as you please, for
he is the most innocent, agreeable, facetious man I ever met with.” His
scepticism was subject for his friends’ wit and his own. He heard
Carlyle preach in Athelstaneford Church. “I did not think that such
heathen morality would have passed in East Lothian.” One day when he sat
in the Poker Club it was mentioned that a clerk of Sir William Forbes,
the banker, had bolted with £900. When he was taken, there was found in
one pocket Hume’s _Treatise on Human Nature_ and in the other Boston’s
_Fourfold State of Man_, this latter being a work of evangelical
theology. His moderate friends presently suggested that no man’s
morality could hold out against the combination. Dr. Jardine of the Tron
Kirk vigorously argued with him on various points of theology, suggested
by Hume’s _Natural History of Religion_. His friend, like most folk in
Edinburgh, lived in a flat off a steep turnpike stair, down which Hume
fell one night in the darkness. Jardine got a candle and helped the
panting philosopher to his feet. Your old Edinburgh citizen never could
resist the chance of a cutting remark. The divine was no exception.
“Davy, I have often tell’t ye that ‘natural licht’ is no’ sufficient.”
Like Socrates, he hid his wit under an appearance of simplicity. His own
mother’s opinion of him was: “Davy’s a fine, good-natured crater, but
uncommon wake-minded.” He had his weaknesses, undoubtedly. Lord Saltoun
said to him, referring to his credulity, “David, man, you’ll believe
onything except the Bible,” but like other Scotsmen of his time he did
not believe overmuch in Shakespeare. In 1757 he thus addresses the
author of _Douglas_: “You possess the true theatrical genius of
Shakespeare and Otway, refined from the barbarisms of the one, and the
licentiousness of the other.” Put beside this Burns’s famous and fatuous
line: “Here Douglas forms wild Shakespeare into plan,” and what can you
do but shudder? When young, he had paid his court to a lady of fashion,
and had met with scant courtesy. He was told afterwards that she had
changed her mind. “So have I,” said the philosopher. On another occasion
he was more gallant. Crossing the Firth in a gale he said to Lady
Wallace, who was in the boat, that they would soon be food for the
fishes. “Will they eat you or me?” said the lady. “Ah,” was the answer,
“those that are gluttons will undoubtedly fall foul of me, but the
epicure will attack your ladyship.” David, like the fishes he described,
was a bit of an epicure of the simplest kind. He would sup with his
moderate friends in Johnny Dowie’s tavern in Libberton’s Wynd. On the
table lay his huge door-key, wherewith his servant, Peggy, had been
careful to provide him that she might not have to rise to let him in.
After all, the friends did not sit very late, and the supper was some
simple Scots dish—haddock, or tripe, or fluke, or pies, or it might be
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account