One glittering Bohemian figure, though he was much greater and much
else, lights up for us those Edinburgh taverns, Johnnie Dowie’s and the
rest, those Edinburgh clubs, the Crochallan Fencibles and the others,
that figure is Robert Burns. His winter of 1786-1787 in the Scots
capital is famous. To us, more than a century after, it still satisfies
the imagination, a striking, dramatic, picturesque appearance. On the
whole, Edinburgh, not merely her great but common men, received him
fitly. One day in that winter Jeffrey was standing in the High Street
staring at a man whose appearance struck him, he could scarce tell why.
A person standing at a shop door tapped him on the shoulder and said:
“Ay, laddie, ye may weel look at that man; that’s Robert Burns.” He
never saw him again. His experience in this was like that of Scott; but
you are glad at any rate that Burns and Scott did meet, else had that
Edinburgh visit wanted its crowning glory. Scott was then fifteen. He
saw Robin in Professor Fergusson’s house at Sciennes. It was a
distinguished company, and Scott, always modest, held his tongue. There
was a picture in the room of a soldier lying dead in the snow, by him
his dog and his widow with his child in her arms. Burns was so affected
at the idea suggested by the picture that “he actually shed tears,” like
the men of the heroic age, says Andrew Lang; he asked who wrote the
lines which were printed underneath, and Scott alone remembered that
they were from the obscure Langhorne. “Burns rewarded me with a look and
a word which, though a mere civility, I then received, and still
recollect, with very great pleasure.” Scott goes on to describe Burns as
like the “douce guid man who held his own plough.” Most striking was his
eye: “It was large and of a dark cast and glowed (I say literally
_glowed_) when he spoke with feeling or interest. I never saw such
another eye in a human head, though I have seen the most distinguished
men in my time.” Whether Scott was right in thinking that Burns talked
with “too much humility,” I will not discuss. We know what Robin thought
of the “writer chiel.” The most pleasing result of his Edinburgh visit,
as it is to-day still the most tangible, was the monument, tasteful and
sufficient, which he put over Fergusson’s grave in the Canongate
Churchyard. R.L.S., by the way, from his distant home in the South Seas,
was anxious that if neglected it should be put in order. I do not think
it has ever been neglected. I have seen it often and it was always
curiously spick and span: these _vates_ have not lacked pious services
at the hands of their followers. Scott was not so enthusiastic an
admirer, but he knew his Fergusson well and quotes him with reasonable
frequency. When Fergusson died Scott was only three years old. Edinburgh
was then a town of little space, and the unfortunate poet may have seen
the child, but he could not have noticed him, and we have no record.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account