In some ways it was a curious and primitive time, certainly none of
these men was a drunkard, but they all wrote as if they quaffed liquor
like the gods of the Norse mythology, and with some of them practice
conformed to theory, whilst fists and sticks were quite orthodox modes
of settling disputes. Even the grave Ebony was not immune. A writer in
Glasgow, one Douglas, was aggrieved at some real or fancied reference in
the Magazine. He hied him to Edinburgh, and as Mr. Blackwood was
entering his shop, he laid a horsewhip in rather a half-hearted fashion,
it would seem, about his shoulders. Then he made off. The editor
publisher forthwith procured a cudgel, and luckily discovered his
aggressor on the point of entering the Glasgow coach; he gave him a
sound beating. As nothing more is heard of the incident, probably both
sides considered honour as satisfied. How difficult to imagine people of
position in incidents like this in Edinburgh of to-day; but I will not
dwell longer on them and their likes, but move on to another era.
“_Virgilium viditantum_,” very happily quoted Scott, the only time he
ever saw (save for a casual street view) and spoke with Burns. One
wishes that there was more to be said of Scott and Carlyle. Carlyle was
a student at Edinburgh, and passed the early years of his literary
working life there. He saw Scott on the street many a time and earnestly
desired a more intimate knowledge. This meeting would have been as
interesting as that, but it was not to be. Never was fate more ironical,
nay, perverse. Goethe was the friend and correspondent of both, and it
seemed to him at Weimar an odd thing that these men, both students of
German literature, both citizens of Edinburgh, should not be personal
friends. He did everything he could. Through Carlyle he sent messages
and gifts to Scott, and these Carlyle transmitted in a modest and
courteous note (13th April 1828). Alas! it was after the deluge. Scott,
with the bravest of hearts, yet with lessening physical and mental
power, was fighting that desperate and heroic battle we know so well.
The letter went unanswered, and they never met. Less important people
were kinder. Jeffrey told Carlyle he must give him a lift, and they were
great friends afterwards. In 1815 for the first time he met Edward
Irving in a room off Rose Street. The latter asked a number of local
questions about Annan, which subject did not interest the youthful sage
at all; finally, he professed total ignorance and indifference as to the
history and condition of some one’s baby. “You seem to know nothing,”
said Irving very crossly. The answer was characteristic. “Sir, by what
right do you try my knowledge in this way? I have no interest to inform
myself about the births in Annan, and care not if the process of birth
and generation there should cease and determine altogether.” Carlyle
studied for the Scots kirk, but he was soon very doubtful as to his
vocation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account