Apocryphal books (Old Testament); Enoch (Biblical figure); Ethiopic book of Enoch -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
iv. _The Dream-Visions_ (chapters lxxxiii.-xc.). This book consists of
two dream-visions; the first deals with the judgement brought upon the
world by the deluge on account of sin; the origin of sin is again traced
to the angels who fell. It concludes with a hymn of praise to God in
which a prayer is offered that all flesh may not be destroyed
(lxxxiii.-lxxxiv.). The second dream-vision is much longer; it gives in
brief outline the history of the world to the founding of the Messianic
Kingdom. First, the patriarchs, symbolized by bulls, etc. (lxxxv.); then
the fallen angels, also described in symbolic language, and their
punishment (lxxxvi.-lxxxviii.). The history then proceeds to deal more
specifically with Israel from the time of Noah to the Maccabæan revolt
(lxxxix.-xc. 19). Throughout the dream-vision symbolic language is used;
the faithful in Israel are spoken of as the sheep, while the Gentiles
are symbolized by wild beasts and birds of prey.
The dream-vision concludes with some familiar eschatological notes: the
judgement and condemnation of the wicked; the establishment of the New
Jerusalem; the conversion of the Gentiles, who become subject to Israel;
the gathering-in of the dispersed Israelites; the resurrection of the
righteous dead, and the setting-up of the Messianic Kingdom on the
appearance of the Messiah (xc. 20-38).
v. The _Concluding Section_ of the Book (xcii.-cv.; xci. 1-10, 18, 19
also belong here) is a complete, though short, work; but there are some
obvious interpolations, and it is quite possible that some parts of the
text are dislocated. This makes the understanding of the book difficult;
but if we follow Charles’s guidance here the difficulties will
disappear. He says that this concluding piece has “in some degree
suffered at the hands of the final editor of the book, both in the way
of direct interpolation and of severe dislocations of the text. The
interpolations are: xci. 11, xciii. 11-14, xciv. 7^d, xcvi. 2. The
dislocations of the text are a more important feature of the book. They
are confined (with the exception of xciii. 13-14, and of cvi. 17^a which
should be read immediately after cvi. 14) to xci.-xciii. All critics are
agreed as to the chief of these. xci. 12-17 should undoubtedly be read
directly after xciii.... Taken together xciii. 1-10, xci. 12-17 form an
independent whole—the Apocalypse of Weeks—which has been incorporated in
xci.-civ.... The remaining dislocations need only to be pointed out in
order to be acknowledged. On other grounds we find that xci.-civ. is a
book of different authorship from that of the rest of the sections. Now,
this being so, this section obviously begins with xcii.: ‘Written by
Enoch the Scribe,’ etc. On xcii. follows xci. 1-10, 18, 19 as a natural
sequel, where Enoch summons his children to receive his parting words.
Then comes the Apocalypse of Weeks, xciii. 1-10, xci. 12-17. The
original order of the text, therefore, was: xcii. xci. 1-10, 18, 19,
xciii. 1-10, xci.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account