Apocryphal books (Old Testament); Enoch (Biblical figure); Ethiopic book of Enoch -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
The special points of interest that should be studied in seeking to
realize the importance of these books of Enoch for the study of
Christian origins are the problems of evil, including, of course, the
subjects of dæmonology, and future judgement; the Messiah and the
Messianic Kingdom—the title “Son of Man” is of special importance—and
the Resurrection. There are, of course, other subjects which will
suggest themselves in studying the book.
ABBREVIATIONS, BRACKETS, AND SYMBOLS SPECIALLY USED IN THE TRANSLATION
OF 1 ENOCH
E denotes the Ethiopic Version.
G^s denotes the fragments of the Greek Version preserved in Syncellus:
in the case of 8^b-9^b there are two forms of the text, G^{s1} G^{s2}.
G^g denotes the large fragment of the Greek Version discovered at
Akhmîm, and deposited in the Gizeh Museum, Cairo.
* * * * *
The following brackets are used in the translation of 1 Enoch:
⌜ ⌝. The use of these brackets means that the words so enclosed are
found in G^g but not in E.
〚 〛. The use of these brackets means that the words so enclosed are
found in E but not in G^g or G^s.
‹ ›. The use of these brackets means that the words so enclosed are
restored.
[ ]. The use of these brackets means that the words so enclosed are
interpolations.
( ). The use of these brackets means that the words so enclosed are
supplied by the editor.
The use of =thick type= denotes that the words so printed are emended.
† † = corruption in the text.
A series of points, ... = some words which have been lost.
Footnote 1:
_Jewish and Christian Apocalypses_, pp. 15, 16 (1913).
Footnote 2:
G. H. Box, _The Ezra Apocalypse_, pp. 35, 36 (1912).
Footnote 3:
The general Pharisaic point of view regarding this may be gathered
from Matt. iii. 7-10.
Footnote 4:
Burkitt rightly insists that we should speak of the collection as the
books, not the book, of Enoch.
Footnote 5:
Burkitt, _op. cit._, 28-30.
Footnote 6:
_i. e._ the “Pious ones,” or “Saints.”
Footnote 7:
_Die Sadduzäer_ (1912).
Footnote 8:
_i. e._, according to him, i.-xxxvi., lxxii.-lxxxii., lxxxiii.-xc.,
xci. 12-17, xciii.
Footnote 9:
See Gen. v. 21-23.
Footnote 10:
_Op. cit._, p. 18.
Footnote 11:
Gen. v. 24.
Footnote 12:
_i. e._ “The Book of the Heavenly Luminaries,” as Charles calls it.
Footnote 13:
_i. e._ “the righteous”; a play on the word _Zaddûkim_, the “sons of
Zadok,” _i. e._ the Sadducees.
Footnote 14:
Leszynsky, _op. cit._, pp. 253 ff.
Footnote 15:
Chaps. i.-xxxii. 6, and xix. 3-xxi. 9 in a duplicate form were
discovered at Akhmîm in 1886-1887; vi.-x. 14, xv. 8-xvi. 1, and viii.
4-ix. 4 in a duplicate form, have been preserved in Syncellus; lxxxix.
42-49 occurs in a Greek Vatican MS. (No. 1809); there are also a few
quotations in early Greek ecclesiastical writings; and i. 9, v. 4,
xxvii. 2 are quoted in the Epistle of St. Jude 14, 15.
Footnote 16:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account