Et dès lors je me suis baigné dans le poème De la mer, infusé d'astres et latescent, Dévorant les azurs verts où, flottaison blême Et ravie, un noyé pensif parfois descend, Où, teignant tout à coup les bleuités, délires Et rythmes lents sous les rutilements du jour, Plus fortes que l'alcool, plus vastes que vos lyres, Fermentent les rousseurs amères de l'amour. (Tr. 43) The whole poem marches: all of Rimbaud's poems march, and in _les Illuminations_ there are marvelous belly dances. It is a pity that his life, so poorly known, was not the true _vita abscondita_; what is known disgusts from what can be understood of it. Rimbaud was like those women whom we are not surprised to learn have taken to religion in some house of shame; but what revolts still more is that he seems to have been a jealous and passionate mistress: here the aberration becomes debauched, being sentimental. Senancour, the man who has spoken most freely of love, says of these inharmonious liaisons where the female falls so low that she has no name except in the dirtiest slang: "When in a very particular situation, the need results in a minute of misconduct, we can perhaps pardon men totally vulgar, or at least banish its memory; but how understand that which becomes a habit, an attachment? The fault may have been accidental; but that which is joined to this act of brutality, that which is not unforseen, becomes ignoble. If even a passion capable of troubling the head and almost of depriving one of liberty, has often left an ineffaceable stain, what disgust will not a consent given in cold-blood inspire? Intimacy in this manner, that is the height of shame, the irremediable infamy." But the intelligence, conscious or unconscious, though not having all rights, has the right of all absolutions. ... Qui sait si le genie N'est pas une de vos vertus, (Tr. 44) monsters, whether you are called Rimbaud,--or Verlaine? FRANCIS POICTEVIN Like all writers who have achieved an understanding of life, Francis Poictevin, though a born novelist, promptly renounced the novel. He knows that everything happens, that a fact in itself is not more interesting than another fact and that the manners of expression alone have significance. I recall something to this effect reported by Sarcey apropos of the lamentable Murger: "About gave him a subject for a novel; he made nothing of it. He was decidedly a sluggard." It is very difficult to persuade certain old men--old or young--that there are no _subjects_; there is only a _subject_ in literature, and that he who writes, and all literature, that is to say all philosophy, can arise equally from the cry of a run-over dog as from Faust's exclamations as he questions Nature: "Where seize thee, O infinite Nature? And thou, Breasts?"