The book of the ladies: Illustrious Dames: The Reign and Amours of the Bourbon Régime — John Shaqi
The book of the ladies: Illustrious Dames: The Reign and Amours of the Bourbon RégimeBrantôme, Pierre de Bourdeille
History
The book of the ladies: Illustrious Dames: The Reign and Amours of the Bourbon Régime
Brantôme, Pierre de Bourdeille
France -- Biography; France -- Court and courtiers; Queens; Women -- Biography
The years went by in this sterile round. He was now thirty-five years
old. The hope of a great fortune was realized no more on the side of his
king than on that of his beautiful, virtuous, and rich lady. He is, no
doubt, “liked, known, and made welcome by the kings, his masters, by his
queens and his princesses, and all the great seigneurs, who held him in
such esteem that the name of Brantôme had great renown.” But he is not
satisfied with the Court small-change in which his services are paid. He
is vexed that his own lightheartedness is taken at its word; he would be
very glad indeed if that love of liberty with which he decked himself
were put to greater trials. Philosopher in spite of himself, he finds
his disappointments all the more painful because of his own opinion of
his merits. He sees men to whom he believes himself superior, preferred
before him. “His companions, not equal to him,” he says in the epitaph
he composed for himself, “surpassed him in benefits received, in
promotions and ranks, but never in virtue or in merit.” And he adds,
with posthumous resignation: “God be praised nevertheless for all, and
for his sacred mercy!”
Meantime, perchance a queen, Catherine de’ Medici or Marguerite de
Valois, deigns to drop into his ear some trifling word which he relishes
with delight. Henri de Guise [le Balafré], who was ten years younger
than himself, called him “my son;” and the Baron de Montesquieu, the one
that killed the Prince de Condé at Jarnac and was very much older than
Brantôme, who had pulled him out of the water during certain aquatic
games on the Seine, called him “father.” Such were the familiarities
with which he was treated.
He was, it is true, chevalier of the Order of Saint-Michel, but that was
not enough to console his ambition. He complained that they degraded
that honour, no longer reserved to the nobility of the sword. He thinks
it bad, for instance, that it was granted to his neighbour, Michel de
Montaigne. “We have seen,” he says, “counsellors coming from the courts
of parliament, abandoning robes and the square cap to drag a sword
behind them, and at once the king decks them with the collar, without
any pretext of their going to war. This is what was given to the Sieur
de Montaigne, who would have done much better to continue to write his
Essays instead of changing his pen into a sword, which does not suit
him. The Marquis de Trans obtained the Order very easily from the king
for one of his neighbours, no doubt in derision, for he is a great
joker.” Brantôme always speaks very slightingly of Montaigne because the
latter was of lesser nobility than his own; but that does not prevent
the Sieur de Montaigne from being to our eyes a much greater man than
the Seigneur de Brantôme.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account